Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33349709›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2021

Long-term self-renewing stem cells in the adult mouse hippocampus identified by intravital imaging.

Sara Bottes, Baptiste N Jaeger, Gregor-Alexander Pilz, David J Jörg, John Darby Cole, Merit Kruse, Lachlan Harris, Vladislav I Korobeynyk, Izaskun Mallona, Fritjof Helmchen and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 75 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
75citing papers in PubMed
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

75 citing papers in PubMed, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Hallmarks of stem cell aging.Cell stem cell · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Therapeutic modulation of neurogenesis to improve hippocampal plasticity and cognition in aging and Alzheimer's disease.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025
    Review
  16. Neural stem cell heterogeneity in adult hippocampus.Cell regeneration (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

15 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Sara Bottes *Laboratory of Neural Plasticity, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Baptiste N Jaeger *Laboratory of Neural Plasticity, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8728-797X
Gregor-Alexander Pilz *Laboratory of Neural Plasticity, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6161-4976
David J JörgWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5960-0260
John Darby ColeLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3615-8702
Merit KruseLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Lachlan HarrisNeural Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Vladislav I KorobeynykLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Izaskun MallonaInstitute of Molecular Life Sciences and SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2853-7526
Fritjof HelmchenLaboratory of Neural Circuit Dynamics, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8867-9569
François GuillemotNeural Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, The Francis Crick Institute, London, UK.
Benjamin D SimonsWellcome Trust-Medical Research Council Stem Cell Institute, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3875-7071
Sebastian JessbergerLaboratory of Neural Plasticity, Faculties of Medicine and Science, Brain Research Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. jessberger@hifo.uzh.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0056-8275
University of Zurich · CHThe Francis Crick Institute · GBWellcome/MRC Cambridge Stem Cell Institute · GBSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) BraincompathEC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) StembarEuropean Research Council 670757Medical Research Council MC_PC_12009Medical Research Council MC_PC_17230Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 310030_196869Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) BSCGI0_157859Swiss National Science Foundation 157859Wellcome Trust 098357Wellcome Trust 106187Wellcome Trust FC001089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) generate neurons throughout life in the mammalian hippocampus. However, the potential for long-term self-renewal of individual NSCs within the adult brain remains unclear. We used two-photon microscopy and followed NSCs that were genetically labeled through conditional recombination driven by the regulatory elements of the stem cell-expressed genes GLI family zinc finger 1 (Gli1) or achaete-scute homolog 1 (Ascl1). Through intravital imaging of NSCs and their progeny, we identify a population of Gli1-targeted NSCs showing long-term self-renewal in the adult hippocampus. In contrast, once activated, Ascl1-targeted NSCs undergo limited proliferative activity before they become exhausted. Using single-cell RNA sequencing, we show that Gli1- and Ascl1-targeted cells have highly similar yet distinct transcriptional profiles, supporting the existence of heterogeneous NSC populations with diverse behavioral properties. Thus, we here identify long-term self-renewing NSCs that contribute to the generation of new neurons in the adult hippocampus.

Indexed as

AnimalsBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsCell LineageFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHippocampusHomeodomain ProteinsIntravital MicroscopyMaleMetallothionein 3MiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, TransgenicMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonNerve RegenerationNerve Tissue ProteinsAscl1 protein, mouseBasic Helix-Loop-Helix ProteinsGli1 protein, mouseHod protein, mouseHomeodomain ProteinsMetallothionein 3Nerve Tissue ProteinsZinc Finger Protein GLI1

Identifiers

PMID33349709
PMCPMC7116750
OpenAlexW3114648893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.