Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33349674›Full record

Trial reportNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2021

Distinct trajectories of response to prefrontal tDCS in major depression: results from a 3-arm randomized controlled trial.

Stephan A Goerigk, Frank Padberg, Markus Bühner, Nina Sarubin, Tyler S Kaster, Zafiris J Daskalakis, Daniel M Blumberger, Lucas Borrione, Lais B Razza, Andre R Brunoni

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephan A GoerigkDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Frank PadbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Nußbaumstraße 7, 80336, Munich, Germany.
Markus BühnerDepartment of Psychological Methodology and Assessment, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Leopoldstraße 13, 80802, Munich, Germany.
Nina SarubinHochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Infanteriestraße 11A, 80797, Munich, Germany.
Tyler S KasterTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1001 Queen Street West, Toronto, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5299-4794
Zafiris J DaskalakisTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1001 Queen Street West, Toronto, Canada.
Daniel M BlumbergerTemerty Centre for Therapeutic Brain Intervention, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 1001 Queen Street West, Toronto, Canada.
Lucas BorrioneDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, R Dr Ovidio Pires de Campos 785, 2o andar, 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7367-2882
Lais B RazzaDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, R Dr Ovidio Pires de Campos 785, 2o andar, 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil.
Andre R BrunoniDepartment and Institute of Psychiatry, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, R Dr Ovidio Pires de Campos 785, 2o andar, 05403-000, São Paulo, Brazil. brunoni@usp.br.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6310-3571
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAUniversidade de São Paulo · BRLMU Klinikum · DEHochschule Fresenius · DELudwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a safe, effective treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). While antidepressant effects are heterogeneous, no studies have investigated trajectories of tDCS response. We characterized distinct improvement trajectories and associated baseline characteristics for patients treated with prefrontal tDCS, an active pharmacotherapy (escitalopram), and placebo. This is a secondary analysis of a randomized, non-inferiority, double-blinded trial (ELECT-TDCS, N = 245). Participants were diagnosed with an acute unipolar, nonpsychotic, depressive episode, and presented Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-items, HAM-D) scores ≥17. Latent trajectory modeling was used to identify HAM-D response trajectories over a 10-week treatment. Top-down (hypothesis-driven) and bottom-up (data-driven) methods were employed to explore potential predictive features using, respectively, conservatively corrected regression models and a cross-validated stability ranking procedure combined with elastic net regularization. Three trajectory classes that were distinct in response speed and intensity (rapid, slow, and no/minimal improvement) were identified for escitalopram, tDCS, and placebo. Differences in response and remission rates were significant early for all groups. Depression severity, use of benzodiazepines, and age were associated with no/minimal improvement. No significant differences in trajectory assignment were found in tDCS vs. placebo comparisons (38.3, 34, and 27.6%; vs. 23.3, 43.3, and 33.3% for rapid, slow, and no/minimal trajectories, respectively). Additional features are suggested in bottom-up analyses. Summarily, groups treated with tDCS, escitalopram, and placebo differed in trajectory class distributions and baseline predictors of response. Our results might be relevant for designing further studies.

Indexed as

Major Depressive DisorderTranscranial Direct Current StimulationCitalopramDepressionDouble-Blind MethodHumansTreatment OutcomeCitalopram

Identifiers

PMID33349674
PMCPMC8027859
OpenAlexW3117382415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.