Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33349638›Full record

ArticleNature communications2020

Brain morphology predicts social intelligence in wild cleaner fish.

Zegni Triki, Yasmin Emery, Magda C Teles, Rui F Oliveira, Redouan Bshary

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. On the mirror test and the evolutionary origin of self-awareness in vertebrates.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The fish challenge to vertebrate cognitive evolution.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The endangered brain: actively preservingRoyal Society open science · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. A marine cleaning mutualism provides new insights in biological market dynamics.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. The psychological foundations of reputation-based cooperation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Relative telencephalon size does not affect collective motion in the guppy (Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  18. Social complexity affects cognitive abilities but not brain structure in a Poeciliid fish.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
  19. Flexible learning in complex worlds.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zegni TrikiInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland. zegni.triki@gmail.com.
Yasmin EmeryInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-3021-622X
Magda C TelesInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande, 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0002-3051-8332
Rui F OliveiraInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Rua da Quinta Grande, 6, 2780-156, Oeiras, Portugal.ORCID 0000-0003-1528-618X
Redouan BsharyInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, Emile-Argand 11, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7198-8472

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is generally agreed that variation in social and/or environmental complexity yields variation in selective pressures on brain anatomy, where more complex brains should yield increased intelligence. While these insights are based on many evolutionary studies, it remains unclear how ecology impacts brain plasticity and subsequently cognitive performance within a species. Here, we show that in wild cleaner fish (Labroides dimidiatus), forebrain size of high-performing individuals tested in an ephemeral reward task covaried positively with cleaner density, while cerebellum size covaried negatively with cleaner density. This unexpected relationship may be explained if we consider that performance in this task reflects the decision rules that individuals use in nature rather than learning abilities: cleaners with relatively larger forebrains used decision-rules that appeared to be locally optimal. Thus, social competence seems to be a suitable proxy of intelligence to understand individual differences under natural conditions.

Indexed as

Emotional IntelligenceAnimalsAnimals, WildBehavior, AnimalBrainCell CountCerebellumFishesOrgan SizePopulation DensityProsencephalon

Identifiers

PMID33349638
PMCPMC7752907

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.