Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33349621›Full record

ArticleAging2020

The reliability, validity, and sensitivity of the Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) in older adults with foot disorders.

Emmanuel Navarro-Flores, Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa Vallejo, Marta Elena Losa-Iglesias, Patricia Palomo-López, César Calvo-Lobo, Daniel López-López, Eva Maria Martínez-Jiménez, Carlos Romero-Morales

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Aging, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Walking Speed Assessed by 4-Meter Walk Test in the Community-Dwelling Oldest Old Population in Vietnam.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Emmanuel Navarro-FloresFaculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Department of Nursing, University of Valencia, Frailty Research Organized Group (FROG), Valencia, Spain.
Ricardo Becerro de Bengoa VallejoSchool of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Marta Elena Losa-IglesiasFaculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
Patricia Palomo-LópezUniversity Center of Plasencia, Universidad de Extremadura, Plasencia, Spain.
César Calvo-LoboSchool of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Daniel López-LópezResearch, Health and Podiatry Group, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Eva Maria Martínez-JiménezAntonio Nebrija University, Madrid, Spain.
Carlos Romero-MoralesFaculty of Sport Sciences, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Villaviciosa de Odón, Madrid, Spain.
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUniversidad de Extremadura · ESUniversidade da Coruña · ESUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ESUniversidad Nebrija · ESUniversidad Rey Juan Carlos · ESUniversitat de València · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Edmonton Frail Scale (EFS) is an index employed to measure alterations related to frailty. The main objective in this research was to develop the EFS short-form (EFS-SF) and to evaluate its validity, reliability, and sensitivity to predict frailty disability outcomes in elderly patients with foot disabilities.

resultsExploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the EFS-SF revealed the presence of three components, as in the original EFA. There were significant differences (

conclusionThe EFS-SF is a reliable and valid instrument to measure frailty in patients with and without foot disabilities.

methodA cross sectional descriptive study was carried out. The study population was aged over 60 years (

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overCognitionCross-Sectional StudiesFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleFoot DiseasesFrailtyFunctional StatusHealth StatusHumansMaleNutritional StatusReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and Specificityelderlyfoot deformitiesfoot diseasesfoot disordersfrailty

Identifiers

PMID33349621
PMCPMC7803512
OpenAlexW3105620674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.