Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33349145›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation2021

Regulators, Pivotal Clinical Trials, and Drug Regulation in the Age of COVID-19.

Joel Lexchin, Janice Graham, Matthew Herder, Tom Jefferson, Trudo Lemmens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health services : planning, administration, evaluation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joel LexchinFaculty of Health, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5120-8029
Janice GrahamFaculty of Medicine, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Matthew HerderShulich School of Law, Health Law Institute, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Tom JeffersonDepartment of Continuing Education, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Trudo LemmensFaculty of Law Toronto, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicine regulators rely on pivotal clinical trials to make decisions about approving a new drug, but little is known about how they judge whether pivotal trials justify the approval of new drugs. We explore this issue by looking at the positions of 3 major regulators: the European Medicines Agency, Food and Drug Administration, and Health Canada. Here we report their views and the implications of those views for the approval process. On various points, the 3 regulators are ambiguous, consistent, and demonstrate flexibility. The range of views may well reflect different regulatory cultures. Although clinical trial information from pivotal trials is becoming more available, regulators are still reluctant to provide detailed information about how that information is interpreted. As medicines and vaccines come up for approval for treatment of COVID-19, transparency in how pivotal trials are interpreted will be critical in determining how these treatments should be used.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicDrug ApprovalCanadaConsumer Product SafetyCOVID-19Drug and Narcotic ControlEuropeHumansSARS-CoV-2United StatesCOVID-19drug regulatorsEuropean Medicines AgencyFood and Drug AdministrationHealth Canadapivotal trials

Identifiers

PMID33349145
PMCPMC7756060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.