ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2020
Identification of Markers Predicting Clinical Course in Patients with IgG4-Related Ophthalmic Disease by Unbiased Clustering Analysis.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of markers predicting clinical course in patients with Behcet disease by combination of machine learning and unbiased clustering analysis.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025Article
- Applications of artificial intelligence and bioinformatics methodologies in the analysis of ocular biofluid markers: a scoping review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo describe the clinical features of patients with immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related ophthalmic disease (IgG4-ROD) grouped by unbiased cluster analysis using peripheral blood test data and to find novel biomarkers for predicting clinical features.
methodsOne hundred and seven patients diagnosed with IgG4-ROD were divided into four groups by unsupervised hierarchical cluster analysis using peripheral blood test data. The clinical features of the four groups were compared and novel markers for prediction of clinical course were explored.
resultsUnbiased cluster analysis divided patients into four groups. Group B had a significantly higher frequency of extraocular muscle enlargement (
conclusionUnsupervised hierarchical clustering analysis using routine blood test data differentiates four distinct clinical phenotypes of IgG4-ROD, which suggest differences in pathophysiologic mechanisms. High serum IgG4 is a potential predictor of worsened BCVA, and high serum IgE is a potential predictor of extraocular muscle enlargement in IgG4-ROD patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.