ArticleBiochemical and biophysical research communications2021
Ligand binding to a humanized anti-cocaine mAb measured by dye absorption spectroscopy.
Article in Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Novel partial reduction of the humanized anti-cocaine mAb h2E2 for selective cysteine labeling.Biochemical and biophysical research communications · 2024Article
- Characterization and optimization of fluorescein isothiocyanate labeling of humanized h2E2 anti-cocaine mAb.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2023Article
- Isothermal titration calorimetry determination of thermodynamics of binding of cocaine and its metabolites to humanized h2E2 anti-cocaine mAb.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022Article
- Tyrosine nitration of a humanized anti-cocaine mAb differentially affects ligand binding of cocaine and its metabolites.Biochemistry and biophysics reports · 2022Article
- Cocaine binding to the Fab fragment of a humanized anti-cocaine mAb quantitated by dye absorption and fluorescence spectroscopy.Journal of immunological methods · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Here we demonstrate that the antigen binding function of a humanized anti-cocaine mAb (h2E2) can be directly and easily determined using simple and inexpensive absorption spectroscopy and dyes commonly used for differential scanning fluorimetry, such as DASPMI and SYPRO Orange. Therapeutic monoclonal antibodies are commonly formulated in buffers which can interfere with necessary functional assays, containing additives and excipients such as mild detergents. Using the undiluted therapeutic product h2E2 mAb in its formulation buffer containing 0.01% polysorbate 80, the number of antigen/cocaine binding sites can be determined by the increase in absorbance (for DASPMI dye) or by the decrease in absorbance maximum wavelength (for SYPRO Orange dye), confirming proper function of the therapeutic mAb product. This ligand-induced visible dye absorption change can also be used to qualitatively evaluate the relative affinities of various metabolites of cocaine. These results are confirmed and extended by binding data obtained in the same formulation buffer using intrinsic tyrosine and tryptophan fluorescence quenching by cocaine, as well as by differential scanning fluorimetry. Interestingly, the binding of the cocaine metabolite norcocaine was demonstrated to be differentially affected by the pH 6 formulation buffer used for this mAb, presumably due to the differential ionizability of the demethylated norcocaine tropane ring nitrogen. This simple, direct, and inexpensive technique should prove useful for evaluation of other small molecule binding mAbs directly in their formulation buffers containing detergent, allowing rapid functional assessment of the produced therapeutic proteins.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.