Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33347017›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical psychopharmacology

Guideline Adherence of Monitoring Antipsychotic Use for Nonpsychotic Indications in Children and Adolescents: A Patient Record Review.

Mariken Dinnissen, Andrea Dietrich, Judith H van der Molen, Anne M Verhallen, Ynske Buiteveld, Suzanne Jongejan, Pieter W Troost, Jan K Buitelaar, Barbara J van den Hoofdakker, Pieter J Hoekstra

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical psychopharmacology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Mariken DinnissenFrom the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Andrea DietrichFrom the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Judith H van der MolenFrom the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Anne M VerhallenFrom the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Ynske BuiteveldFrom the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Suzanne JongejanFrom the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
Pieter W TroostDe Bascule Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam.
Jan K Buitelaar
Barbara J van den Hoofdakker
Pieter J HoekstraFrom the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen.
University Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Groningen · NLDe Bascule · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotics are frequently prescribed to children and adolescents for nonpsychotic indications. Guidelines recommend regularly assessing treatment response and adverse effects and the ongoing need for their use. We aimed to assess adherence to recommendations of available guidelines regarding monitoring antipsychotic use and to test the influence of children's age, sex, intelligence quotient, and diagnosis on adherence.

methodsWe reviewed 426 medical records from 26 centers within 3 large Dutch child and adolescent psychiatry organizations, excluding children with schizophrenia, psychosis, mania, or an intelligence quotient below 70. We investigated whether there was regular assessment of treatment response, adverse events (physical and laboratory), and at least annual discussion of the need of continued use.

resultsOn average, treatment response was assessed in 69.3% of the recommended treatment periods, height in 25.6%, weight in 30.6%, blood pressure in 20.6%, evaluation of adverse events in 19.4%, and cardiometabolic measures in 13.7%; discontinuation and/or continued need was discussed at least annually in 36.2%. Extrapyramidal and prolactin-related adverse effects, waist circumference, glucose, and lipids were rarely investigated. Higher age was associated with lower rates of assessment of treatment response. Most antipsychotics were prescribed long-term. In those children with sufficient documentation of the course of treatment, 57.7% was still using an antipsychotic 3 years after initiation.

conclusionsOur findings indicate insufficient adherence to guideline recommendations for monitoring antipsychotic use in children and adolescents, as well as long duration of use in the majority of children. Especially, older children are at higher risk of receiving suboptimal care.

Indexed as

AdolescentAntipsychotic AgentsChildChild, PreschoolDrug MonitoringDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansMalePsychotic DisordersRetrospective StudiesAntipsychotic Agents

Identifiers

PMID33347017
PMCPMC7752226
OpenAlexW3113610187

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.