Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33346888›Full record

ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2021

Self-examination low-cost full-field OCT (SELFF-OCT) for patients with various macular diseases.

Claus von der Burchard, Moritz Moltmann, Jan Tode, Christoph Ehlken, Helge Sudkamp, Dirk Theisen-Kunde, Inke König, Gereon Hüttmann, Johann Roider

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Claus von der BurchardDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Kiel, University Medical Center, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany. claus.vonderburchard@uksh.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2163-5905
Moritz MoltmannMedical Laser Center Lübeck GmbH, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Jan TodeDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Kiel, University Medical Center, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christoph EhlkenDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Kiel, University Medical Center, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Helge SudkampMedical Laser Center Lübeck GmbH, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Dirk Theisen-KundeMedical Laser Center Lübeck GmbH, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Inke KönigInstitute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, University of Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Gereon HüttmannMedical Laser Center Lübeck GmbH, Peter-Monnik-Weg 4, 23562, Lübeck, Germany.
Johann RoiderDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Kiel, University Medical Center, Arnold-Heller-Strasse 3, 24105, Kiel, Germany.
Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel · DEMedizinisches Laserzentrum Lübeck (Germany) · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13N13766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe treatment guidelines for many macular diseases rely on frequent monitoring with optical coherence tomography (OCT). However, the burden of frequent disease control leads to low therapy adherence in real life. OCT home monitoring would address this issue but requires an inexpensive and self-operable device. With self-examination low-cost full-field OCT (SELFF-OCT), our group has introduced a novel technology that may fulfill both requirements. In this pilot study, we report the initial experiences with a clinical prototype.

methodsFifty-one patients with different macular diseases were recruited in a cross-sectional study. The most common diseases were age-related macular degeneration (AMD; 39/51), diabetic macular edema (DME; 6/51), and retinal vein occlusion (RVO; 3/51). Patients received a short training in device usage and then performed multiple self-scans with the SELFF-OCT device. For comparison, scans with a standard clinical spectral domain (SD-)OCT were taken.

resultsAfter a brief training, 77% of the patients were able to successfully acquire images that were clinically gradable. No significant influence on success could be found for age (p = 0.08) or BCVA (p = 0.97). Relevant disease biomarkers in the most common retinal diseases could be detected.

conclusionsSELFF-OCT was used successfully for retinal self-examination and in the future could be used for retinal home monitoring. Future improvements in technology are expected to improve success rates and image quality.

trial registrationThe Trial was registered in the German Trial Register under the number DRKS00013755 on 14.03.2018.

Indexed as

Diabetic RetinopathyMacular EdemaRetinal DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPilot ProjectsSelf-ExaminationTomography, Optical CoherenceAge-related macular degeneration (AMD)BiomarkerHome monitoringMaculaOptical coherence tomography (OCT)Retina

Identifiers

PMID33346888
PMCPMC8166739
OpenAlexW3115964072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.