Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33346855›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2021

A new nomogram to predict the need for tracheostomy in burned patients.

Stefan Janik, Stefan Grasl, Erdem Yildiz, Gerold Besser, Jonathan Kliman, Philipp Hacker, Florian Frommlet, Alexandra Fochtmann-Frana, Boban M Erovic

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan JanikDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1161-4871
Stefan GraslDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Erdem YildizDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Gerold BesserDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Jonathan KlimanDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Philipp HackerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Florian FrommletCenter for Medical Statistics, Informatics, and Intelligent Systems, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra Fochtmann-FranaDivision of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Boban M ErovicInstitute of Head and Neck Diseases, Evangelical Hospital Vienna, Hans-Sachs Gasse 10-12, Vienna, Austria. b.erovic@ekhwien.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATHanusch Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the impact of tracheostomy on complications, dysphagia and outcome in second and third degree burned patients.

methodsInpatient mortality, dysphagia, severity of burn injury (ABSI, TBSA) and complications in tracheotomized burn patients were compared to (I) non-tracheotomized burn patients and (II) matched tracheotomized non-burn patients.

results134 (30.9%) out of 433 patients who underwent tracheostomy, had a significantly higher percentage of inhalation injury (26.1% vs. 7.0%; p < 0.001), higher ABSI (8.9 ± 2.1 vs. 6.0 ± 2.7; p < 0.001) and TBSA score (41.4 ± 19.7% vs. 18.6 ± 18.8%; p < 0.001) compared to 299 non-tracheotomized burn patients. However, complications occurred equally in tracheotomized burn patients and matched controls and tracheostomy was neither linked to dysphagia nor to inpatient mortality at multivariate analysis. In particular, dysphagia occurred in 6.2% of cases and was significantly linked to length of ICU stay (OR 6.2; p = 0.021), preexisting neurocognitive impairments (OR 5.2; p = 0.001) and patients' age (OR 3.4; p = 0.046). A nomogram was calculated based on age, TBSA and inhalation injury predicting the need for a tracheostomy in severely burned patients.

conclusionUsing the new nomogram we were able to predict with significantly higher accuracy the need for tracheostomy in severely burned patients. Moreover, tracheostomy is safe and is not associated with higher incidenc of complications, dysphagia or worse outcome.

Indexed as

BurnsTracheostomyHumansLength of StayMultivariate AnalysisNomogramsRetrospective StudiesBurn injuryComplicationsDysphagiaNomogramTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID33346855
PMCPMC8328908
OpenAlexW3116612375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.