ArticleJMIR medical informatics2020
Model-Based Reasoning of Clinical Diagnosis in Integrative Medicine: Real-World Methodological Study of Electronic Medical Records and Natural Language Processing Methods.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03274908 (Real-world Clinical Study and Medical Machine Intelligence Study for Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine by Using Medical Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Methods), which is not on this map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Real-world Clinical Study and Medical Machine Intelligence Study for Traditional Chinese Internal Medicine by Using Medical Big Data and Artificial Intelligence Methods
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large language models linking traditional Chinese medicine knowledge and clinical practice.Chinese medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in allergy practice: Digital transformation and the future of clinical care.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2025Review
- Annotated corpus for traditional formula-disease relationships in biomedical articles.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Data Ownership in the AI-Powered Integrative Health Care Landscape.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- ChatGPT for shaping the future of dentistry: the potential of multi-modal large language model.International journal of oral science · 2023Review
- Article
- Boosting Delirium Identification Accuracy With Sentiment-Based Natural Language Processing: Mixed Methods Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2022Article
- Developing Automated Computer Algorithms to Phenotype Periodontal Disease Diagnoses in Electronic Dental Records.Methods of information in medicine · 2022Article
- Current and Future Strategies for the Diagnosis and Treatment of the Alpha-Gal Syndrome (AGS).Journal of asthma and allergy · 2022Review
- Stroke Outcome Measurements From Electronic Medical Records: Cross-sectional Study on the Effectiveness of Neural and Nonneural Classifiers.JMIR medical informatics · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIntegrative medicine is a form of medicine that combines practices and treatments from alternative medicine with conventional medicine. The diagnosis in integrative medicine involves the clinical diagnosis based on modern medicine and syndrome pattern diagnosis. Electronic medical records (EMRs) are the systematized collection of patients health information stored in a digital format that can be shared across different health care settings. Although syndrome and sign information or relative information can be extracted from the EMR and content texts can be mapped to computability vectors using natural language processing techniques, application of artificial intelligence techniques to support physicians in medical practices remains a major challenge.
objectiveThe purpose of this study was to investigate model-based reasoning (MBR) algorithms for the clinical diagnosis in integrative medicine based on EMRs and natural language processing. We also estimated the associations among the factors of sample size, number of syndrome pattern type, and diagnosis in modern medicine using the MBR algorithms.
methodsA total of 14,075 medical records of clinical cases were extracted from the EMRs as the development data set, and an external test data set consisting of 1000 medical records of clinical cases was extracted from independent EMRs. MBR methods based on word embedding, machine learning, and deep learning algorithms were developed for the automatic diagnosis of syndrome pattern in integrative medicine. MBR algorithms combining rule-based reasoning (RBR) were also developed. A standard evaluation metrics consisting of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score was used for the performance estimation of the methods. The association analyses were conducted on the sample size, number of syndrome pattern type, and diagnosis of lung diseases with the best algorithms.
resultsThe Word2Vec convolutional neural network (CNN) MBR algorithms showed high performance (accuracy of 0.9586 in the test data set) in the syndrome pattern diagnosis of lung diseases. The Word2Vec CNN MBR combined with RBR also showed high performance (accuracy of 0.9229 in the test data set). The diagnosis of lung diseases could enhance the performance of the Word2Vec CNN MBR algorithms. Each group sample size and syndrome pattern type affected the performance of these algorithms.
conclusionsThe MBR methods based on Word2Vec and CNN showed high performance in the syndrome pattern diagnosis of lung diseases in integrative medicine. The parameters of each group's sample size, syndrome pattern type, and diagnosis of lung diseases were associated with the performance of the methods.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT03274908; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03274908.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.