Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33346568›Full record

ArticleJournal of computer assisted tomography

The Diagnostic Value of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy in the Grading of Pediatric Gliomas.

Rong Yao, Ailan Cheng, Menglin Liu, Zhengwei Zhang, Biao Jin, Hong Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computer assisted tomography. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Incidental brain tumor findings in children: prevalence, natural history, management, controversies, challenges, and dilemmas.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rong YaoFrom the Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University.
Ailan ChengDepartment of Radiology, Shanghai East Hospital affiliated to Tongji University.
Menglin LiuDepartment of Radiology, Xin Hua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Zhengwei ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Xin Hua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Biao JinDepartment of Radiology, Xin Hua Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Hong YuFrom the Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiaotong University.
Shanghai Chest Hospital · CNShanghai East Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aims of this retrospective study were to assess the value of the quantitative analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) metabolites in differentiating grades of pediatric gliomas. PATIENTS AND

methodsTwo hundred and nine pathology-confirmed pediatric gliomas (143 low-grade gliomas [LGGs] and 66 high-grade gliomas [HGGs]) were retrospectively analyzed on preoperative diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging, of which 84 also underwent 1H-MRS. The mean tumor ADC (ADCmean), minimum tumor ADC (ADCmin), tumor/normal brain ADC ratio (ADC ratio), and metabolites (choline/creatine ratio [Cho/Cr], N-acetylaspartate/creatine ratio [NAA/Cr], N-acetylaspartate/choline ratio [NAA/Cho], presence of lactate and lipid peaks) between LGGs and HGGs were analyzed.

resultsThere were significant negative correlations between the ADC values and glioma grade. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the cutoff ADCmean value of 1.192 × 10-3 mm2/s for the differentiation between low- and high-grade pediatric gliomas provided a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of 77.6%, 80.3%, 78.5%, 89.5% and 62.4%, respectively; the cutoff ADCmin value of 0.973 × 10-3 mm2/s resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 86.0%, 90.9%, 87.6%, 95.3%, and 75.0%, respectively; the cutoff ADC ratio value of 1.384 resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 73.4%, 87.9%, 78.0%, 92.9%, and 60.4%, respectively. A tendency for a positive correlation was found between Cho/Cr and glioma grade. A negative correlation was demonstrated between NAA/Cr or NAA/Cho and glioma grade. Statistical analysis demonstrated a threshold value of 2.601 for Cho/Cr to provide a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 81.8%, 51.7%, 71.4%, 76.3%, and 60.0%, respectively, in dividing LGGs and HGGs; a threshold value of 0.705 for NAA/Cr to provide a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 76.4%, 75.9%, 76.2%, 85.7%, and 62.9%, respectively; a threshold value of 0.349 for NAA/Cho to provide a sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, and NPV of 87.3%, 86.2%, 86.9%, 92.3%, and 78.1%, respectively.

conclusionsThe ADC values and metabolites appeared to be significantly correlated to grade in pediatric gliomas. The predictive values may be helpful for preoperative diagnostic predictions.

Indexed as

AdolescentBrainBrain NeoplasmsChildChild, PreschoolCholineCreatineFemaleGliomaHumansInfantMalePredictive Value of TestsProton Magnetic Resonance SpectroscopyRetrospective StudiesCholineCreatine

Identifiers

PMID33346568
PMCPMC7972297
OpenAlexW3117923959

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.