Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33346184›Full record

ArticleJournal of visualized experiments : JoVE2020

Enhanced Viability for Ex vivo 3D Hydrogel Cultures of Patient-Derived Xenografts in a Perfused Microfluidic Platform.

Lindsey K Sablatura, Kristin M Bircsak, Peter Shepherd, Karla Queiroz, Mary C Farach-Carson, Pamela E Constantinou, Anthony Saleh, Nora Navone, Daniel A Harrington

Open access · greenAbstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of visualized experiments : JoVE, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 47% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Lindsey K SablaturaDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University.
Kristin M BircsakMimetas US Inc.
Peter ShepherdDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Karla QueirozMimetas B.V.
Mary C Farach-CarsonDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University; Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center.
Pamela E ConstantinouDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University; Sheikh Ahmed Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Anthony SalehMimetas US Inc.
Nora NavoneDepartment of Genitourinary Medical Oncology Research, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Daniel A HarringtonDepartment of BioSciences, Rice University; Department of Bioengineering, Rice University; Department of Diagnostic and Biomedical Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center; Daniel.Harrington@uth.tmc.edu.
Rice University · USMimetas (Netherlands) · NLThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston · US

Funding

Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis: Biology and TargetingP01CA098912 · NCI · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI ZAYZAFOON, MAJD · 2003 to 2019
$24.0M
Patient-Derived Models of Prostate Cancer for Personalized MedicineU01CA224044 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI CHEN, YU, FUTREAL, PHILLIP ANDREW · 2019 to 2023
$5.1M
NCI NIH HHS HHSN261200700015CNCI NIH HHS HHSN261201700015CNCI NIH HHS P01 CA098912NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224044
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patient-derived xenografts (PDX), generated when resected patient tumor tissue is engrafted directly into immunocompromised mice, remain biologically stable, thereby preserving molecular, genetic, and histological features, as well as heterogeneity of the original tumor. However, using these models to perform a multitude of experiments, including drug screening, is prohibitive both in terms of cost and time. Three-dimensional (3D) culture systems are widely viewed as platforms in which cancer cells retain their biological integrity through biochemical interactions, morphology, and architecture. Our team has extensive experience culturing PDX cells in vitro using 3D matrices composed of hyaluronic acid (HA). In order to separate mouse fibroblast stromal cells associated with PDXs, we use rotation culture, where stromal cells adhere to the surface of tissue culture-treated plates while dissociated PDX tumor cells float and self-associate into multicellular clusters. Also floating in the supernatant are single, often dead cells, which present a challenge in collecting viable PDX clusters for downstream encapsulation into hydrogels for 3D cell culture. In order to separate these single cells from live cell clusters, we have employed density step gradient centrifugation. The protocol described here allows for the depletion of non-viable single cells from the healthy population of cell clusters that will be used for further in vitro experimentation. In our studies, we incorporate the 3D cultures in microfluidic plates which allow for media perfusion during culture. After assessing the resultant cultures using a fluorescent image-based viability assay of purified versus non-purified cells, our results show that this additional separation step substantially reduced the number of non-viable cells from our cultures.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesHeterograftsMicrofluidicsAnimalsCell SurvivalCentrifugation, Density GradientDisease Models, AnimalHumansHydrogelsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedMiceStaining and LabelingHydrogels

Identifiers

PMID33346184
PMCPMC9250080
OpenAlexW3112330771

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.