Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33346091›Full record

Trial reportInternational journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics2021

Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy to the Prostate Bed With Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT): A Phase 2 Trial.

Elton Trigo Teixeira Leite, Clarissa Cerchi Angotti Ramos, Victor Augusto Bertotti Ribeiro, Bernardo Peres Salvajoli, William Carlos Nahas, João Victor Salvajoli, Fabio Ynoe Moraes

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy to the prostate bed with or without pelvic lymph nodes: a prospective trial.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Elton Trigo Teixeira LeiteInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: eltontt@gmail.com.
Clarissa Cerchi Angotti RamosInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Victor Augusto Bertotti RibeiroInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bernardo Peres SalvajoliInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
William Carlos NahasInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
João Victor SalvajoliInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Fabio Ynoe MoraesDepartment of Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, Canada.
Universidade de São Paulo · BRInstituto do Câncer do Estado de São Paulo · BRQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePostoperative radiation therapy (RT) is a common therapy used for patients with prostate cancer. Although clinical trials have established the safety and efficacy of hypofractionation as a primary therapy, there are limited data in a postoperative setting. We conducted a prospective trial to evaluate the safety and feasibility of postoperative hypofractionated RT to the prostate bed. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this phase 2 trial, patients submitted to radical prostatectomy were treated with hypofractionated RT to the prostate bed (adjuvant or salvage). The prescribed dose was 51 Gy in 15 fractions (3.4 Gy per fraction), using intensity modulated and image guided radiation therapy techniques. The primary endpoint was the rate of acute genitourinary (GU) grade ≥2 toxicity. Secondary endpoints included acute gastrointestinal (GI) and late GU/GI toxicities, biochemical failure-free survival (BFFS), metastasis-free survival, cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and health-related quality of life.

resultsOf 64 enrolled patients, 61 received radiation therapy (57 salvage and 4 adjuvant radiation therapy). After a median follow-up of 16 months, 11.5% of patients experienced acute grade ≥2 GU symptoms and 13.1% experienced acute grade ≥2 GI symptoms. The late grade ≥2 GU toxicity rate was 8.2%, and 1 patient (1.6%) developed both acute and late grade 3 GU toxicity. The late grade ≥2 GI toxicity rate was 11.5%, and no grade 3 GI adverse events were reported. The short follow-up limits our ability to perform a robust oncologic endpoint assessment; however, the 2-year BFFS, use of subsequent salvage therapy, and the development of metastasis were 95.1%, 0%, and 0%, respectively.

conclusionsHypofractionated RT to the prostate bed in 15 treatments was safe, with an acceptable GU and GI toxicity profile. Further study in large, randomized trials is warranted.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overFeasibility StudiesGastrointestinal TractHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesProstateProstatectomyProstate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsQuality of LifeRadiation Dose HypofractionationRadiation InjuriesRadiotherapy, AdjuvantProstate-Specific Antigen

Identifiers

PMID33346091
OpenAlexW3112739539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.