Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33345801›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM2019

Adherence to self-glucose monitoring recommendations and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies complicated by diabetes mellitus.

Sarah A Wernimont, Jessica S Sheng, Alexandria Tymkowicz, Diedre K Fleener, Karen M Summers, Craig H Syrop, Janet I Andrews

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of obstetrics & gynecology MFM, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03338829 nacompletednot on this map

Incentive Models on Testing Adherence for Women With Diabetes During Pregnancy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of IowaRan2016 to 2022Enrolled130ConditionsDiabetes in PregnancyArmsPositive incentive, Loss aversion
NCT07184775 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Maternal Continuous Glucose Monitoring Surveillance Compared to Finger-stick Glucose Monitoring in Pregnancies With Type 2 Pregestational Diabetes

TypeinterventionalSponsorThomas Jefferson UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled70ConditionsType 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM), Pregnancy, Continuous Glucose Monitoring SystemArmsContinuous glucose monitor, Glucometer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarah A WernimontDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA; Fraternal Order of Eagles Diabetes Research Center, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA. Electronic address: sarah-wernimont@uiowa.edu.
Jessica S ShengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Alexandria TymkowiczDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Diedre K FleenerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Karen M SummersDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Craig H SyropDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
Janet I AndrewsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Iowa Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA.
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Diabetes Research Training Program Diversity SupplementT32DK112751 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI Andrew W Norris · 2017 to 2026
$4.8M
Fatty Acid Defects & Oxidative Stress Modulate Islet Function in Cystic FibrosisR01DK097820 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI NORRIS, ANDREW W, UC, ALIYE · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK097820NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK112751
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSelf-glucose monitoring is critical for the management of diabetes mellitus in pregnancy; yet, validated reports of adherence to testing recommendations and associated perinatal outcomes are limited.

objectiveUsing cloud-based, self-glucose monitoring technology, we sought to answer the following questions: (1) Are there differences in the rates of testing adherence based on type of diabetes mellitus in pregnancy? (2) Is adherence to glucose monitoring recommendations associated with perinatal outcomes in pregnancies that are complicated by diabetes mellitus? We hypothesized that adherence to glucose testing recommendations varies by type of diabetes mellitus and that increased adherence to testing recommendations would be associated with improved perinatal outcomes. STUDY

designThis single-center, prospective cohort study included women with type 2 diabetes mellitus and gestational diabetes mellitus who were enrolled in a perinatal diabetes program at <29 weeks gestation between December 2015 and June 2018. All women received a cellular-enabled glucometer that uploaded glucose values to a cloud-based, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant platform in real time that ensured transmission of accurate glucose values. The primary outcome was adherence to self-glucose monitoring recommendations. Four glucose checks were advised daily, and percentage of adherence was calculated. Secondary outcomes were preeclampsia, cesarean delivery, large-for-gestational-age neonates, and neonatal hypoglycemia. The study was powered to detect a 10% difference in the primary outcome of adherence to advised self-glucose monitoring by diabetes mellitus type. Adjusted risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals were generated with the use of logistic regression.

resultsThis study included 103 eligible women. Baseline characteristics differed between groups, with women with type 2 diabetes mellitus having higher initial HgbA1c and body mass index when compared with women with gestational diabetes mellitus. No differences were noted in age or parity. Adherence was calculated over 20±6 weeks for women with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with 9±4 weeks for women with gestational diabetes mellitus. Overall adherence to glucose monitoring was significantly less for women with type 2 diabetes mellitus compared with those with gestational diabetes mellitus. Mean testing adherence rates were 51%, 66%, and 70% for type 2 diabetes mellitus, and gestational diabetes mellitus, class A1 and A2, respectively (P=.016). We found that, for every 10% increase in adherence to testing recommendations, the odds of cesarean delivery, neonatal hypoglycemia, and large-for-gestational-age fetuses decreases by 15-20%. There was no association between adherence and rates of preeclampsia.

conclusionThis study shows that overall adherence to testing recommendations differs by diabetes mellitus type and is associated with neonatal outcomes. Improved outcomes with higher adherence may reflect more timely medication adjustments in response to real-time glucose values. Programs aimed at improving adherence could prove beneficial.

Indexed as

Blood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Blood GlucoseFemaleGlucoseHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyProspective StudiesBlood GlucoseGlucoseadherencecellular-enabled glucometerdiabetes mellituspregnancyself-glucose monitoring

Identifiers

PMID33345801
PMCPMC9797350
OpenAlexW2964431946

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.