ArticleClinical rehabilitation2021
Psychometric evaluation of a newly developed measure of emotionalism after stroke (TEARS-Q).
Article in Clinical rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
The Validity and Reliability of the Turkish Version of the Testing Emotionalism After Recent Stroke - Questionnaire (TEARS-Q)
Applying the Metacognitive Model to Post-Stroke Emotionalism: A Multiphasic Case Series Piloting the Attention Training Technique
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pharmaceutical interventions for emotionalism after stroke.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Observational
- Post-stroke emotionalism: Diagnosis, pathophysiology, and treatment.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2024Review
- Practical guidance on use of TEARS-Q to diagnose post-stroke emotionalism.Clinical rehabilitation · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate, psychometrically, a new measure of tearful emotionalism following stroke: Testing Emotionalism After Recent Stroke - Questionnaire (TEARS-Q).
settingAcute stroke units based in nine Scottish hospitals, in the context of a longitudinal cohort study of post-stroke emotionalism. SUBJECTS: A total of 224 clinically diagnosed stroke survivors recruited between October 1st 2015 and September 30th 2018, within 2 weeks of their stroke. MEASURES: The measure was the self-report questionnaire TEARS-Q, constructed based on post-stroke tearful emotionalism diagnostic criteria: (i) increased tearfulness, (ii) crying comes on suddenly, with no warning (iii) crying not under usual social control and (iv) crying episodes occur at least once weekly. The reference standard was presence/absence of emotionalism on a diagnostic, semi-structured post-stroke emotionalism interview, administered at the same assessment point. Stroke, mood, cognition and functional outcome measures were also completed by the subjects.
resultsA total of 97 subjects were female, with a mean age 65.1 years. 205 subjects had sustained ischaemic stroke. 61 subjects were classified as mild stroke. TEARS-Q was internally consistent (Cronbach's alpha 0.87). TEARS-Q scores readily discriminated the two groups, with a mean difference of -7.18, 95% CI (-8.07 to -6.29). A cut off score of 2 on TEARS-Q correctly identified 53 of the 61 stroke survivors with tearful emotionalism and 140 of the 156 stroke survivors without tearful emotionalism. One factor accounted for 57% of the item response variance, and all eight TEARS-Q items acceptably discriminated underlying emotionalism.
conclusionTEARS-Q accurately diagnoses tearful emotionalism after stroke.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.