Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33345379›Full record

ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2021

Electrocardiographic predictors of successful resynchronization of left bundle branch block by His bundle pacing.

Ahran D Arnold, Matthew J Shun-Shin, Daniel Keene, James P Howard, Ji-Jian Chow, Elaine Lim, Smaragda Lampridou, Alejandra A Miyazawa, Amal Muthumala, Mark Tanner and 10 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Stepwise application of ECG and electrogram-based criteria to ensure electrical resynchronization with left bundle branch pacing.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahran D ArnoldNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7597-0170
Matthew J Shun-ShinNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1179-0867
James P HowardNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9989-6331
Ji-Jian ChowNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Elaine LimNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Smaragda LampridouNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Alejandra A MiyazawaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Amal MuthumalaCardiology Department, North Middlesex University Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK.
Mark TannerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Norman A QureshiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
David C LefroyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Michael Koa-WingNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Nick W F LintonNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Phang Boon LimNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Nicholas S PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Prapa KanagaratnamNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.
Angelo AuricchioDivision of Cardiology, Fondazione Cardiocentro Ticino, Lugano, Switzerland.
Darrel P FrancisNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3410-0814
Zachary I WhinnettNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2775-5126
Hammersmith Hospital · GBEpatocentro Ticino · CHSt Bartholomew's Hospital · GB

Funding

British Heart Foundation CS/15/3/31405British Heart Foundation FS 04/079British Heart Foundation FS/10/38/28268British Heart Foundation FS/13/44/30291British Heart Foundation FS/14/27/30752British Heart Foundation FS/15/25/31423British Heart Foundation FS/15/53/31615British Heart Foundation FS/19/4/34013British Heart Foundation FS/20/11/34750British Heart Foundation RE/18/4/34215British Heart Foundation RG/16/3/32175Department of Health P74166Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 212183/Z/18/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHis bundle pacing (HBP) is an alternative to biventricular pacing (BVP) for delivering cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure and left bundle branch block (LBBB). It is not known whether ventricular activation times and patterns achieved by HBP are equivalent to intact conduction systems and not all patients with LBBB are resynchronized by HBP.

objectiveTo compare activation times and patterns of His-CRT with BVP-CRT, LBBB and intact conduction systems.

methodsIn patients with LBBB, noninvasive epicardial mapping (ECG imaging) was performed during BVP and temporary HBP. Intrinsic activation was mapped in all subjects. Left ventricular activation times (LVAT) were measured and epicardial propagation mapping (EPM) was performed, to visualize epicardial wavefronts. Normal activation pattern and a normal LVAT range were determined from normal subjects.

resultsForty-five patients were included, 24 with LBBB and LV impairment, and 21 with normal 12-lead ECG and LV function. In 87.5% of patients with LBBB, His-CRT successfully shortened LVAT by ≥10 ms. In 33.3%, His-CRT resulted in complete ventricular resynchronization, with activation times and patterns indistinguishable from normal subjects. EPM identified propagation discontinuity artifacts in 83% of patients with LBBB. This was the best predictor of whether successful resynchronization was achieved by HBP (logarithmic odds ratio, 2.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.07-4.31; p = .04).

conclusionNoninvasive electrocardiographic mapping appears to identify patients whose LBBB can be resynchronized by HBP. In contrast to BVP, His-CRT may deliver the maximum potential ventricular resynchronization, returning activation times, and patterns to those seen in normal hearts.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyHeart FailureBundle-Branch BlockBundle of HisElectrocardiographyHumansTreatment OutcomeVentricular Function, Leftcardiac resynchronization therapyECGIHis bundle pacingHis resynchronization therapynoninvasive epicardial mapping

Identifiers

PMID33345379
PMCPMC8607473
OpenAlexW3114048859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.