Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33345258›Full record

ArticleConnectomics in neuroImaging : second international workshop, CNI 2018, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018 : proceedings. CNI (Workshop) (2nd : 2018 : Granada, Spain)2018

Riemannian Regression and Classification Models of Brain Networks Applied to Autism.

Eleanor Wong, Jeffrey S Anderson, Brandon A Zielinski, P Thomas Fletcher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Connectomics in neuroImaging : second international workshop, CNI 2018, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2018, Granada, Spain, September 20, 2018 : proceedings. CNI (Workshop) (2nd : 2018 : Granada, Spain), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. An Explainable Geometric-Weighted Graph Attention Network for Identifying Functional Networks Associated with Gait Impairment.Medical image computing and computer-assisted intervention : MICCAI ... International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eleanor WongUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Jeffrey S AndersonUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
Brandon A ZielinskiUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.
P Thomas FletcherUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA.

Funding

Beyond Diagnostic Classification of Autism: Neuroanatomical, Functional, and Behavioral PhenotypesR01EB022876 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI PHILLIPS, BEI WANG · 2016 to 2018
$1.1M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022876
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional connectivity from resting-state functional MRI (rsfMRI) is typically represented as a symmetric positive definite (SPD) matrix. Analysis methods that exploit the Riemannian geometry of SPD matrices appropriately adhere to the positive definite constraint, unlike Euclidean methods. Recently proposed approaches for rsfMRI analysis have achieved high accuracy on public datasets, but are computationally intensive and difficult to interpret. In this paper, we show that we can get comparable results using connectivity matrices under the log-Euclidean and affine-invariant Riemannian metrics with relatively simple and interpretable models. On ABIDE Preprocessed dataset, our methods classify autism versus control subjects with 71.1% accuracy. We also show that Riemannian methods beat baseline in regressing connectome features to subject autism severity scores.

Identifiers

PMID33345258
PMCPMC7749519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.