Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33345237›Full record

ReviewJSES international2020

The modern reverse shoulder arthroplasty and an updated systematic review for each complication: part I.

Sarav S Shah, Benjamin T Gaal, Alexander M Roche, Surena Namdari, Brian M Grawe, Macy Lawler, Stewart Dalton, Joseph J King, Joshua Helmkamp, Grant E Garrigues and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in JSES international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sarav S ShahAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Benjamin T GaalAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Alexander M RocheAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Surena NamdariAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Brian M GraweAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Macy LawlerAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Stewart DaltonAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Joseph J KingAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Joshua HelmkampAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Grant E GarriguesAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Thomas W WrightAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Bradley S SchochAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Kyle FlikAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Randall J OttoAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Richard JonesAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Andrew JawaAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Peter McCannAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Joseph AbboudAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Gabe HorneffAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Glen RossAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Richard FriedmanAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Eric T RicchettiAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Douglas BoardmanAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Robert Z TashjianAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
Lawrence V GulottaAmerican Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Multicenter Task Force on Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Complications, Rosemont, IL, USA.
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGlobally, reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) has moved away from the Grammont design to modern prosthesis designs. The purpose of this 2-part study was to systematically review each of the most common complications of RSA, limiting each search to publications in 2010 or later. In this part (part I), we examined (1) scapular notching (SN), (2) periprosthetic infection (PJI), (3) mechanical failure (glenoid or humeral component), and (4) neurologic injury (NI).

methodsFour separate PubMed database searches were performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines. Overall, 113 studies on SN, 62 on PJI, 34 on mechanical failure, and 48 on NI were included in our reviews. Univariate analysis was performed with the χ

resultsThe Grammont design had a higher SN rate vs. all other designs combined (42.5% vs. 12.3%,

conclusionsFocused systematic reviews of the recent literature with a large volume of RSAs demonstrate that with the use of non-Grammont modern prosthesis designs, complications including SN, PJI, glenoid component loosening, and NI are significantly reduced compared with previous studies. As the indications for RSA continue to expand, it is imperative to accurately track the rates and types of complications to justify its cost and increased indications.

Indexed as

complicationsinfectionlooseningneurologic injuryReverse shoulder arthroplastyscapular notching

Identifiers

PMID33345237
PMCPMC7738599
OpenAlexW4235587872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.