Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344879›Full record

ArticleCurrent developments in nutrition2020

Introducing a Suite of Low-Burden Diet Quality Indicators That Reflect Healthy Diet Patterns at Population Level.

Anna W Herforth, Doris Wiesmann, Euridice Martínez-Steele, Giovanna Andrade, Carlos A Monteiro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current developments in nutrition, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anna W HerforthDepartment of Global Health and Population, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6079-9374
Doris WiesmannIndependent Consultant, Schoenwalde, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6151-5460
Euridice Martínez-SteeleDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-2907-3153
Giovanna AndradeDepartment of Preventive Medicine, School of Medicine, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1901-3093
Carlos A MonteiroDepartment of Nutrition, School of Public Health, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-3777-1533

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew low-burden indicators of diet quality exist to track trends over time at low cost and with low technical expertise requirements.

objectiveThe aim was to develop and validate a suite of low-burden indicators to reflect adherence to global dietary recommendations.

methodsUsing nationally representative, cross-sectional, quantitative dietary intake datasets from Brazil and the United States, we tested the association of food-group scores with quantitative consumption aligned with 11 global dietary recommendations. We updated the Healthy Diet Indicator (HDI) to include current quantifiable recommendations of the WHO (HDI-2020). We developed 3 food-group-based scores-an overall Global Dietary Recommendations (GDR) score as an indicator of all 11 recommendations composed of 2 subcomponents: GDR-Healthy, an indicator of the recommendations on "healthy" foods, and GDR-Limit, an indicator of the recommendations on dietary components to limit. We tested associations between these scores and the HDI-2020 and its respective subcomponents. We developed 9 dichotomous food-group-based indicators to reflect adherence to the global recommendations for fruits and vegetables, dietary fiber, free sugars, saturated fat, total fat, legumes, nuts and seeds, whole grains, and processed meats. We conducted receiver operating characteristic and sensitivity-specificity analyses to determine whether the dichotomous indicators were valid to predict adherence to the recommendations in both countries.

resultsThe GDR score and its subcomponents were moderately to strongly associated with the HDI-2020 and its respective subcomponents (absolute values of rank correlation coefficients ranged from 0.55 to 0.66). Of the 9 dichotomous indicators, 8 largely met the criteria for predicting individual global dietary recommendations in both countries; 1 indicator (total fat) did not perform satisfactorily.

conclusionsFood-group consumption data can be used to indicate adherence to quantitative global dietary recommendations at population level. These indicators may be used to track progress of countries and populations toward meeting WHO guidance on healthy diets.

Indexed as

dietary diversity scoresdiet quality monitoringdiet quality questionnaireDQ-Qfood groupsglobal dietary recommendationsWorld Health Organization

Identifiers

PMID33344879
PMCPMC7723758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.