Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344877›Full record

ArticleOTO open

Intraoperative Sentinel Events in the Era of Surgical Safety Checklists: Results of a National Survey.

John D Cramer, Karthik Balakrishnan, Soham Roy, C W David Chang, Emily F Boss, Jean M Brereton, Taskin M Monjur, Brian Nussenbaum, Michael J Brenner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in OTO open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Redefining Nursing in Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Care: Implications of the ICN's 2025 Definitions for an Evolving Specialty.ORL-head and neck nursing : official journal of the Society of Otorhinolaryngology and Head-Neck Nurses · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Impact of nurse-surgeons on patient-centred outcomes: A systematic review.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2022
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

John D CramerDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Karthik BalakrishnanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Soham RoyDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA.
C W David ChangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, Missouri, USA.
Emily F BossDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Jean M BreretonAmerican Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Taskin M MonjurAmerican Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA.
Brian NussenbaumAmerican Board of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michael J BrennerUniversity of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveDespite the implementation of advanced health care safety systems including checklists, preventable perioperative sentinel events continue to occur and cause patient harm, disability, and death. We report on findings relating to otolaryngology practices with surgical safety checklists, the scope of intraoperative sentinel events, and institutional and personal response to these events. STUDY

designSurvey study.

settingAnonymous online survey of otolaryngologists.

methodsMembers of the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery were asked about intraoperative sentinel events, surgical safety checklist practices, fire safety, and the response to patient safety events.

resultsIn total, 543 otolaryngologists responded to the survey (response rate 4.9% = 543/11,188). The use of surgical safety checklists was reported by 511 (98.6%) respondents. At least 1 patient safety event in the past 10 years was reported by 131 (25.2%) respondents; medication errors were the most commonly reported (66 [12.7%] respondents). Wrong site/patient/procedure events were reported by 38 (7.3%) respondents, retained surgical items by 33 (6.4%), and operating room fire by 18 (3.5%). Although 414 (79.9%) respondents felt that time-outs before the case have been the single most impactful checklist component to prevent serious patient safety events, several respondents also voiced frustrations with the administrative burden.

conclusionSurgical safety checklists are widely used in otolaryngology and are generally acknowledged as the most effective intervention to reduce patient safety events; nonetheless, intraoperative sentinel events do continue to occur. Understanding the scope, causes, and response to these events may help to prioritize resources to guide quality improvement initiatives in surgical safety practices.

Indexed as

adverse eventschecklistmedical erroroperating room fireoperating room safetyotolaryngologypatient safetypatient safety eventsquality improvementretained foreign bodysentinel eventswrong-patient surgerywrong-site surgery

Identifiers

PMID33344877
PMCPMC7731722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.