Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344830›Full record

ArticleACS omega2020

Microfluidic Affinity Sensor Based on a Molecularly Imprinted Polymer for Ultrasensitive Detection of Chlorpyrifos.

Shalini Nagabooshanam, Souradeep Roy, Sujit Deshmukh, Shikha Wadhwa, Indra Sulania, Ashish Mathur, Satheesh Krishnamurthy, Lalit M Bharadwaj, Susanta S Roy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS omega, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Shalini NagabooshanamAmity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Souradeep RoyAmity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Sujit DeshmukhDepartment of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar University, Gautam Budh Nagar 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shikha WadhwaAmity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Indra SulaniaInter University Accelerator Centre, Aruna Asaf Ali Marg, New Delhi 110067, India.
Ashish MathurAmity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Satheesh KrishnamurthyNanoscale Energy and Surface Engineering, School of Engineering and Innovation, The Open University, Milton Keynes MK 76AA, United Kingdom.
Lalit M BharadwajAmity Institute of Nanotechnology, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, Sector-125, Noida 201301, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Susanta S RoyDepartment of Physics, School of Natural Sciences, Shiv Nadar University, Gautam Budh Nagar 201314, Uttar Pradesh, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistent use of pesticides in the agriculture field remains a serious issue related to public health. In the present work, molecularly imprinted polymer thin films were developed using electropolymerization of pyrrole (py) onto gold microelectrodes followed by electrodeposition for the selective detection of chlorpyrifos (CPF). The molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP) was synthesized by the electrochemical deposition method, which allowed in-line transfer of MIP on gold microelectrodes without using any additional adhering agents. Various parameters such as pH, monomer ratio, scan rate, and deposition cycle were optimized for sensor fabrication. The sensor was characterized at every stage of fabrication using various spectroscopic, microscopic, and electrochemical techniques. The sensor requires only 2 μL of the analyte and its linear detection range was found to be 1 μM to 1 fM. The developed sensor's limit of detection (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ) were found to be 0.93 and 2.82 fM, respectively, with a sensitivity of 3.98 (μA/(μM)/ mm

Identifiers

PMID33344830
PMCPMC7745425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.