Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344746›Full record

ArticleSSM - population health2020

Analysis of direction of association between radiation risk perception and relocation using a random-intercept and cross lagged panel model: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Michio Murakami, Yoshitake Takebayashi, Mayumi Harigane, Rie Mizuki, Yuriko Suzuki, Tetsuya Ohira, Masaharu Maeda, Seiji Yasumura

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM - population health, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michio MurakamiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Yoshitake TakebayashiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Mayumi HariganeRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Rie MizukiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Yuriko SuzukiNational Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo, 187-8553, Japan.
Tetsuya OhiraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Masaharu MaedaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.
Seiji YasumuraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, 960-1295, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the aftermath of a nuclear disaster, a person's radiation risk perception can harm their sociopsychological health. Although there are reports of an association between radiation risk perception and relocation, the direction of this association has not been clarified yet. In this study, we used a random-intercept and cross lagged panel model (RI-CLPM) to investigate the association and its direction between radiation risk perception and the prefectural-level relocation (i.e., inside/outside of Fukushima Prefecture). We did this by using five waves of longitudinal surveys between 2011 fiscal year and 2015 fiscal year among the people affected by the Fukushima disaster in 2011. We included 90,567 participants aged ≥15 years during the time of the disaster who responded to the questionnaire at least once. RI-CLPM was applied to examine the reciprocal relationship between radiation risk perception and locations. We used two radiation risk perception indicators (i.e., genetic effect and delayed effect) and two handling methods on missing data (i.e., listwise deletion and full information maximum likelihood estimation) as sensitive analyses. The effects of radiation risk perception on relocation were found to be negligibly small. Living inside Fukushima Prefecture reduced radiation risk perception irrespective of the difference of indicators or methods, highlighting that radiation risk perception did not dominantly govern whether people were living inside Fukushima Prefecture, but that the locations also affected radiation risk perception. This was the first study to reveal the direction of the association between radiation risk perception and relocation in the aftermath of nuclear disasters.

Indexed as

Cross lagged panel modelFukushima nuclear accidentRadiation risk perceptionRelocation

Identifiers

PMID33344746
PMCPMC7735972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.