Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344428›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2020

AC Pulsed Field Ablation Is Feasible and Safe in Atrial and Ventricular Settings: A Proof-of-Concept Chronic Animal Study.

Guido Caluori, Eva Odehnalova, Tomasz Jadczyk, Martin Pesl, Iveta Pavlova, Lucia Valikova, Steffen Holzinger, Veronika Novotna, Vladimir Rotrekl, Ales Hampl and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A novel pulsed field ablation system using linear and spiral ablation catheters can create large and durable endocardial and epicardial ventricular lesions in vivo.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Contemporary Trends in Pulsed Field Ablation for Cardiac Arrhythmias.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Pearls and Pitfalls of Pulsed Field Ablation.Korean circulation journal · 2023
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. HumanFrontiers in physiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Guido CaluoriInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Eva OdehnalovaInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Tomasz JadczykInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Martin PeslInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Iveta PavlovaInstitute of Scientific Instruments of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Lucia ValikovaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Steffen HolzingerR&D EP Systems & Sensors, BIOTRONIK SE & Co., KG, Berlin, Germany.
Veronika NovotnaInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Vladimir RotreklInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Ales HamplInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Michal CrhaFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Brno, Czechia.
Dalibor CervinkaDepartment of Power Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Communication, Brno University of Technology, Brno, Czechia.
Zdenek StarekInternational Clinical Research Center, St. Anne's University Hospital Brno, Brno, Czechia.
Masaryk University · CZUniversity Hospital Brno · CZUniversity of Veterinary Sciences Brno · CZBiotronik (Germany) · DEBrno University of Technology · CZCzech Academy of Sciences, Institute of Scientific Instruments · CZMedical University of Silesia · PLUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPulsed field ablation (PFA) exploits the delivery of short high-voltage shocks to induce cells death via irreversible electroporation. The therapy offers a potential paradigm shift for catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmia. We designed an AC-burst generator and therapeutic strategy, based on the existing knowledge between efficacy and safety among different pulses. We performed a proof-of-concept chronic animal trial to test the feasibility and safety of our method and technology.

methodsWe employed 6 female swine - weight 53.75 ± 4.77 kg - in this study. With fluoroscopic and electroanatomical mapping assistance, we performed ECG-gated AC-PFA in the following settings: in the left atrium with a decapolar loop catheter with electrodes connected in bipolar fashion; across the interventricular septum applying energy between the distal electrodes of two tip catheters. After procedure and 4-week follow-up, the animals were euthanized, and the hearts were inspected for tissue changes and characterized. We perform finite element method simulation of our AC-PFA scenarios to corroborate our method and better interpret our findings.

resultsWe applied square, 50% duty cycle, AC bursts of 100 μs duration, 100 kHz internal frequency, 900 V for 60 pulses in the atrium and 1500 V for 120 pulses in the septum. The inter-burst interval was determined by the native heart rhythm - 69 ± 9 bpm. Acute changes in the atrial and ventricular electrograms were immediately visible at the sites of AC-PFA - signals were elongated and reduced in amplitude (

conclusionWe proved that our method and technology of AC-PFA is feasible and safe for atrial and ventricular myocardial ablation, supporting their systematic investigation into effectiveness evaluation for the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia. Further optimization, with energy titration or longer follow-up, is required for a robust atrial and ventricular AC-PFA.

Indexed as

atrial fibrillationirreversible electroporation (IRE)preclinical cardiologypulsed field ablationradiofrequency ablationventricular arrhythmia (VA)

Identifiers

PMID33344428
PMCPMC7744788
OpenAlexW3107934554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.