Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344425›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in chemistry2020

Development of Fluorescence Polarization Immunoassay for Imidacloprid in Environmental and Agricultural Samples.

Liangliang Zhou, Jiachuan Yang, Zhexuan Tao, Sergei A Eremin, Xiude Hua, Minghua Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in chemistry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Liangliang ZhouDepartment of Pesticide Science, State & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Green Pesticide Invention and Application, Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Jiachuan YangDepartment of Pesticide Science, State & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Green Pesticide Invention and Application, Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Zhexuan TaoDepartment of Pesticide Science, State & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Green Pesticide Invention and Application, Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Sergei A EreminChemical Faculty, M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.
Xiude HuaDepartment of Pesticide Science, State & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Green Pesticide Invention and Application, Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Minghua WangDepartment of Pesticide Science, State & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Green Pesticide Invention and Application, Ministry of Education, College of Plant Protection, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Nanjing Agricultural University · CNLomonosov Moscow State University · RU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) for the determination of imidacloprid (IMI) was developed with advantages of simple operation and short assay time. The haptens of IMI, acetamiprid (ACE), and thiamethoxam (THI) were conjugated with fluorescein isothiocyanate ethylenediamine (EDF) and 4'-Aminomethyl fluorescein (AMF), respectively, to prepare six fluorescence tracers. The conjugation of IMI hapten and EDF (IMI-EDF) was selected to develop the FPIA due to the largest fluorescent polarization value increase in the presence of anti-IMI monoclonal antibody. Under the optimum condition, the limit of detection, 50% inhibition concentration and detection range of the FPIA were 1.7, 4.8, and 1.7-16.3 μg/L, respectively. The cross-reactivities (CRs) with the analogs of IMI were negligible except for imidaclothiz with CR of 79.13%. The average recovery of spiked paddy water, corn and cucumber samples were 82.4-118.5% with the RSDs of 7.0-15.9%, which indicated the FPIA had good accuracy. Thus, the developed FPIA was a potential tool for the rapid and accurate determination of IMI in agricultural and environmental samples.

Indexed as

fluorescence polarization immunoassayfluorescent tracershigh throughput detectionimidaclopridpesticide residue

Identifiers

PMID33344425
PMCPMC7738439
OpenAlexW3108016345

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.