Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344258›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020

Multiple Microinvasion Foci in Ductal Carcinoma

Jing Si, Rong Guo, Huan Pan, Xiang Lu, Zhiqin Guo, Chao Han, Li Xue, Dan Xing, Wanxin Wu, Caiping Chen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jing SiDepartment of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Rong GuoDepartment of Breast Surgery, Breast Cancer Center of the Third Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Cancer Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming, China.
Huan PanDepartment of Central Laboratory, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Xiang LuDepartment of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Zhiqin GuoDepartment of Pathology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Chao HanDepartment of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Li XueDepartment of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Dan XingDepartment of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Wanxin WuDepartment of Pathology, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
Caiping ChenDepartment of Breast Disease, The First Hospital of Jiaxing & The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China.
First Hospital of Jiaxing · CNJiaxing University · CNKunming Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDuctal carcinoma

methodsThis study identified 359 patients with DCISM who had undergone axillary evaluation at our institute from January 2006 to December 2015. Patients were categorized as one focus or multiple foci (≥2 foci) according to the pathological results. Clinicopathological features, axillary status, and disease-free survival rate were obtained and analyzed.

resultsOf 359 patients, 233 (64.90%) had one focus of microinvasion and 126 (35.10%) had multiple foci. Overall, 242 (67.41%) and 117 (32.59%) patients underwent sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB) and axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND), respectively. Isolated tumor cells were found in four (1.11%) patients and axillary metastasis rate was 2.51%. Neither axillary evaluation methods (

conclusionEven though the numbers of microinvasion were different and patients with multiple foci of microinvasion tended to have larger tumor size, there was no higher risk of axillary involvement compared with patients with one focus of microinvasion, while patients with multiple microinvasive foci had worse DFS rate. Thus, DCISM patients with multiple foci of microinvasion may be the criterion for more aggressive local-regional treatment. Optimization of adjuvant therapy in DCISM patients is required.

Indexed as

ductal carcinoma in situfocimicroinvasionrecurrencesurvival outcome

Identifiers

PMID33344258
PMCPMC7744719
OpenAlexW3107092571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.