ArticleFrontiers in oncology2020
Accuracy of Endoscopic Diagnosis of
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Diagnostic Performance of Linked Color Imaging Compared to White Light Imaging in Endoscopic Diagnosis ofGut and liver · 2024Pooled it
- Optimizing endoscopic detection of early gastric cancer: stratification and preventive strategies for Peri-ESD diagnostic oversights.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Optimal post-gastroscopy timing of the urea [Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Update on the pathogenesis and clinical management ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal pathophysiology · 2025Review
- [Diagnostic value of endoscopic findings under white light gastroscopy forZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Article
- Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection in the general population in Wuzhou, China: a cross-sectional study.Infectious agents and cancer · 2025Article
- Endoscopic appearances of gastric mucosa in different endoscopic models according to H. pylori infection status.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2024Review
- Improving image classification of gastrointestinal endoscopy using curriculum self-supervised learning.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Unveiling early stage autoimmune gastritis: novel endoscopic insights from two case reports.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Article
- Gastric cancer incidence based on endoscopic Kyoto classification of gastritis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2023Article
- [Clinical Application of the Kyoto Classification of Gastritis].The Korean journal of helicobacter and upper gastrointestinal research · 2023Review
- An explainable artificial intelligence system for diagnosingTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2023Article
- Magnetic controlled capsule endoscope (MCCE)'s diagnostic performance for H. pylori infection status based on the Kyoto classification of gastritis.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Kyoto classification of gastritis: Advances and future perspectives in endoscopic diagnosis of gastritis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Current and Future Perspectives in the Diagnosis and Management ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022Review
- Proposal of minimum elements for screening and diagnosis of gastric cancer by an international Delphi consensus.DEN open · 2022Review
- Endoscopic Diagnosis for H. pylori Infection: White Light Imaging (WLI) vs. Image-Enhanced Endoscopy (IEE).Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2021Article
- Review
- Clinicopathological features and prognosis of developed gastric cancer based on the diagnosis of mucosal atrophy and enlarged folds of stomach by double-contrast upper gastrointestinal barium X-ray radiography.Clinical journal of gastroenterology · 2021Article
- Diagnosis ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is lack of clinical evidence supporting the value of the Kyoto classification of gastritis for the diagnosis of
methodsThis was a prospective and multicenter study with 650 Chinese patients. The
resultsFor past infection, the DOR of UAB was 7.69 (95%CI:3.11-19.1), second only to map-like redness (7.78 (95%CI: 3.43-17.7)). RAC reappearance showed the highest ROC/AUC (0.583). In cases in which at least one of these three specific features of past infection was considered positive, the ROC/AUC reached 0.643. For current infection, nodularity showed the highest DOR (11.7 (95%CI: 2.65-51.2)), followed by diffuse redness (10.5 (95%CI: 4.87-22.6)). Mucosal swelling showed the highest ROC/AUC (0.726). Regular arrangement of collecting venules (RAC) was specific for no infection.
conclusionsThis study provides evidence of the clinical accuracy and robustness of the Kyoto classification of gastritis for the diagnosis of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.