Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344143›Full record

ReviewAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany)2020

Mechanisms for Tuning Engineered Nanomaterials to Enhance Radiation Therapy of Cancer.

Sandhya Clement, Jared M Campbell, Wei Deng, Anna Guller, Saadia Nisar, Guozhen Liu, Brian C Wilson, Ewa M Goldys

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Current Perspectives on Radiosensitizers in Cancer Radiotherapy.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Atomically-precise AuJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Selenium-Doped Nanoheterojunctions for Highly Efficient Cancer Radiosensitization.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  8. Assembling AuJournal of nanobiotechnology · 2024
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandhya ClementARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9556-3508
Jared M CampbellARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0163-4251
Wei DengARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia.
Anna GullerARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia.
Saadia NisarARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia.
Guozhen LiuARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia.
Brian C WilsonDepartment of Medical Biophysics University of Toronto/Princess Margaret Cancer Centre University Health Network Colledge Street Toronto Ontario ON M5G 2C1 Canada.
Ewa M GoldysARC Centre of Excellence for Nanoscale Biophotonics The Graduate School of Biomedical Engineering University of New South Wales High Street Kensington New South Wales 2052 Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2470-7118

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Engineered nanomaterials that produce reactive oxygen species on exposure to X- and gamma-rays used in radiation therapy offer promise of novel cancer treatment strategies. Similar to photodynamic therapy but suitable for large and deep tumors, this new approach where nanomaterials acting as sensitizing agents are combined with clinical radiation can be effective at well-tolerated low radiation doses. Suitably engineered nanomaterials can enhance cancer radiotherapy by increasing the tumor selectivity and decreasing side effects. Additionally, the nanomaterial platform offers therapeutically valuable functionalities, including molecular targeting, drug/gene delivery, and adaptive responses to trigger drug release. The potential of such nanomaterials to be combined with radiotherapy is widely recognized. In order for further breakthroughs to be made, and to facilitate clinical translation, the applicable principles and fundamentals should be articulated. This review focuses on mechanisms underpinning rational nanomaterial design to enhance radiation therapy, the understanding of which will enable novel ways to optimize its therapeutic efficacy. A roadmap for designing nanomaterials with optimized anticancer performance is also shown and the potential clinical significance and future translation are discussed.

Indexed as

nanoparticlesradiation therapyradiodynamic therapyreactive oxygen speciesX‐PDT

Identifiers

PMID33344143
PMCPMC7740107

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.