Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344029›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2020

THE RELATIONSHIP OF RANGE OF MOTION, HIP SHOULDER SEPARATION, AND PITCHING KINEMATICS.

Garrett S Bullock, Jeff Strahm, Tessa C Hulburt, Edward C Beck, Brian R Waterman, Kristen F Nicholson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Kinematic Sequencing of the Football Pass Using Inertial Motion Analysis.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Biomechanical Analysis of the Throwing Athlete and Its Impact on Return to Sport.Arthroscopy, sports medicine, and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  7. Evidence Based Arm Care: The Throwers 10 Revisited.International journal of sports physical therapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Garrett S Bullock
Jeff StrahmDepartment of Athletics Wake Forest University Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Tessa C HulburtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Edward C BeckDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Brian R WatermanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
Kristen F NicholsonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhen pitching a baseball, pelvic and trunk pitching kinematics play an integral role in momentum transfer from the lower extremity to the upper extremity. However, it is unknown how hip and trunk ROM and hip shoulder separation interplay with pelvic and trunk pitching kinematics. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between clinical trunk and hip range of motion (ROM) and pitching biomechanical pelvis and trunk kinematics, and kinematic sequencing. STUDY

designControlled biomechanical study.

methodsHigh school pitchers were assessed for trunk rotation via motion capture and hip ROM via a goniometer prior to pitching. Trunk rotation was designated as dominant and non-dominant sides, and hips as stance and lead limbs. Pitchers threw four fastballs during three dimensional biomechanical assessment. Spearman's Rho correlations were performed between trunk and hip ROM, and trunk and hip biomechanical kinematics, and kinematic pitching sequence.

resultsThirty-two pitchers (mean age: 16.3 ± 1.2 years, height = 184.0 ± 6.9 cm, mass = 76.8 ± 20.8 kg) were included in this study. Their mean pitch velocity was 34.7 ± 2.3 m/s, peak pelvis rotation velocity: 669.1 ± 95.5 deg/s, and peak trunk rotation velocity: 1084.7 ± 93.0 deg/s. There were no differences between dominant and non-dominant side trunk rotation, or between stance and lead hip ROM. There were no significant relationships between trunk or hip ROM and pitching kinematics. There was a significant relationship between hip shoulder separation and peak trunk rotation velocity (r = 0.390, p=0.027). There was a significant relationship between pitch velocity and peak trunk rotation velocity (r = 0.478, p = 0.006). There were no other significant relationships between pitching kinematics or kinematic sequencing.

conclusionHip shoulder separation is related to trunk rotation velocity, and ultimately pitch velocity. These ROM measurements can be used as normative values for hip shoulder separation in high school pitchers. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Indexed as

baseball pitchingBiomechanicsfastballkineticsMovement Systemtrunk rotation Velocity

Identifiers

PMID33344029
PMCPMC7727427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.