Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33344028›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of sports physical therapy2020

FOREARM POSITION MATTERS DURING ECCENTRIC SHOULDER EXERCISES: AN EMG RECRUITMENT STUDY WITH IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATION.

Corbin Hedt, Bradley S Lambert, Joshua Daum, Jentry M Pearson, Patrick C McCulloch

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of sports physical therapy, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Corbin HedtHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Bradley S LambertHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Joshua DaumHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Jentry M PearsonWillis-Knighton Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Shreveport, LA, USA.
Patrick C McCullochHouston Methodist Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
Methodist Sports Medicine · USHouston Methodist · USWillis-Knighton Cancer Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEccentric exercise has demonstrated great utility in the rehabilitation of various shoulder pathologies. Research on the electromyographic (EMG) activity of the shoulder musculature during these activities is limited, however. Furthermore, no studies have observed how forearm positioning during exercise affects EMG output. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose was to examine the degree of specific muscle recruitment among commonly used eccentric exercises in rehabilitation of the upper extremity and shoulder. Secondarily, the authors hypothesized that different hand/forearm positions would alter EMG activity within the targeted musculature during a given exercise. STUDY

designProspective cross-sectional observation of EMG analysis.

methodsThis study analyzed surface EMG data obtained from 10 healthy individuals during five eccentric exercises of the dominant extremity, performed in a randomized order: side-lying eccentric horizontal abduction (SL ER), half-kneeling weighted ball decelerations (BALL DC), seated eccentric external rotation in scaption (STD ER), standing eccentric external rotation at 0deg (STND ER), supine eccentric external rotation at 90deg (SUP ER). Each exercise was performed with two to three forearm position variants commonly used in clinical environments: neutral, pronation, and/or supination. EMG data were collected from the upper trapezius, infraspinatus, teres minor, latissimus dorsi, and anterior/middle/posterior deltoid. Data were analyzed for each individual exercise and within each muscle using a mixed-model ANOVA repeated across forearm position. Significant interactions were followed by a Bonferroni post-hoc test for pairwise comparisons. Effect size was calculated for all significant pairwise comparisons using a Cohen's d statistic.

resultsSignificant differences in EMG activity for the selected musculature exist between forearm positions for four of the five exercises and Cohen's d effect sizes 0.178 - 1.159.

conclusionSpecific eccentric shoulder exercises activate muscles of the shoulder complex differently based on forearm positioning. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.

Indexed as

EMGmovement systemmuscle activityrotator cuffstrengthupper extremity

Identifiers

PMID33344028
PMCPMC7727430
OpenAlexW3115773798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.