ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020
Impact of the expanded examination of fetal heart to the prenatal diagnosis of congenital heart diseases.
Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveIn the present study, for which reasons fetal cardiac evaluation was requested from our pediatric cardiology clinic, the effects of routine fetal cardiac evaluation in obstetric ultrasonography (USG) on the detection of congenital heart disease (CHD) and the distribution of intrauterine diagnosis of CHD according to pregnancy risk profiles were retrospectively analyzed. MATERIALS AND
methodsFetal echocardiography reports which containing the nineteen-month period were retrospectively examined. We performed a fetal echocardiography for all pregnant women who were referred to pediatric cardiology clinic after detail obstetric USG screening. The pregnancies were categorized into two groups based on the risk of CHD: Low-risk and high-risk groups. Detected congenital cardiac structural malformations were classified as complex, moderate, and mild according to perinatal mortality risk.
resultsOf the 736 pregnancies, 22 were twin, and fetal cardiac evaluation was performed in 758 fetuses. There were 341 (46.3%) pregnancies in the high-risk group and 395 (53.6%) pregnancies in the low-risk group. The most common reason for fetal cardiac evaluation request was inability to adequately visualize the fetal heart (36.1%), while suspected fetal cardiac abnormality was the second most common cause (21.3%). Number of fetuses detected with cardiac abnormalities was 80 (23.5%) among high-risk pregnancies, and 20 (5%) among low-risk pregnancies. The most common type of malformation was simple cardiac abnormalities (6%) followed by complex lesions (4.1%). The most common cardiac abnormality was ventricular septal defect comprised of 18 cases (2.4%) while the most common complex cardiac abnormality was pulmonary atresia (1.2%). The rate of consistency was 40.1% between obstetricians and pediatric cardiologist in terms of the diagnosis of the congenital cardiac malformations.
conclusionRoutine evaluation of the fetal heart by means of obstetric USG, including four chambers, outflow tracts' and three vessel views, would allow for diagnosing congenital cardiac malformations to a large extent during the intrauterine period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.