Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343974›Full record

ArticleTurkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology2020

A prospective study of a new prediction model of vaginal birth after cesarean section at a tertiary care centre.

Pinkey Lakra, Bhagyashri Patil, Sunita Siwach, Manisha Upadhyay, Shivani Shivani, Vijayata Sangwan, Rajiv Mahendru

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Turkish journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Pinkey LakraBhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpurkalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9252-6864
Bhagyashri PatilBhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpurkalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4127-0579
Sunita SiwachBhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpurkalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4133-7446
Manisha UpadhyayBhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpurkalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4351-9780
Shivani ShivaniBhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpurkalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6730-8785
Vijayata SangwanBhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpurkalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7775-6293
Rajiv MahendruBhagat Phool Singh Government Medical College for Women, Khanpurkalan, Sonepat, Haryana, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1916-7962
Government Medical College · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo create a new and simple model for predicting the likelihood of vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) section using variables available at the time of admission. MATERIALS AND

methodsA prospective observational study was performed at a tertiary care centre in Haryana over a period of 12 months (January 2018 - December 2018) in pregnant women attending the labour room with one previous cesarean section fulfilling the criteria for undergoing trial of labour after cesarean (TOLAC). The sample size was 150. A VBAC score was calculated for each patient using a new prediction model that included variables available at the time of admission such as maternal age, gestational age, Bishop's score, body mass index, indication for primary cesarean section, and clinically estimated fetal weight. The results of the VBAC scores were correlated with outcomes i.e. successful VBAC or failed VBAC. The chi-square test and Student's t-test was used for comparison among the groups. Descriptive and regression analysis was performed for the study variables.

resultsOut of 150 TOLAC cases, 78% had successful VBAC and the remainder (22%) had failed VBAC. The observed probability of having a successful VBAC for a VBAC score of 0-3 was 34%, 4-6 was 68%, 7-9 was 90%, and ≥10 was 97%. The prediction model performed well with an area under the curve of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.68 to 0.85) of the receiver operating characteristics receiver operating characteristic curve.

conclusionThe present study shows that the proposed VBAC prediction model is a good tool to predict the outcome of TOLAC and can be used to counsel women regarding the mode of delivery in the current and subsequent pregnancies. Further studies of this model and other such models with different permutations and combinations of variables are required.

Indexed as

modelpredictionVaginal birth after a cesarean

Identifiers

PMID33343974
PMCPMC7731607
OpenAlexW3110731708

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.