Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343915›Full record

ArticleHealth psychology open

Adaptive capacity of midwives participating in pregnancy termination procedures: Polish experience.

Jolanta Banasiewicz, Kornelia Zaręba, Hanna Rozenek, Michał Ciebiera, Grzegorz Jakiel, Joanna Chylińska, Krzysztof Owczarek

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jolanta BanasiewiczDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Kornelia ZarębaI Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8262-4380
Hanna RozenekDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Michał CiebieraII Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Grzegorz JakielDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Joanna ChylińskaDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Krzysztof OwczarekDepartment of Medical Psychology and Medical Communication, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland.
Medical University of Warsaw · PLPostgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 181 midwives working in hospitals in Poland. The midwives completed professional psychological tests (CISS questionnaire, EPQ-R questionnaire, OLBI questionnaire) and a questionnaire developed for this study. Midwives participating in pregnancy termination procedures most commonly used the task-oriented coping style. The emotion-oriented coping style was positively related to burnout in the group which performed pregnancy terminations. The analysis showed that the higher the indices of neuroticism, the greater the severity of burnout in both groups. The results indicate the need to conduct an initial assessment of personality resources when employing midwives to the wards.

Indexed as

burnoutcoping with stressmidwivespersonal resourcespregnancy terminationstresstermination of pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID33343915
PMCPMC7731597
OpenAlexW3112253165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.