ReviewTherapeutic advances in drug safety2020
Structured benefit-risk evaluation for medicinal products: review of quantitative benefit-risk assessment findings in the literature.
Review in Therapeutic advances in drug safety, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of Vaccination Against COVID-19: A Systematic Review.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Pooled it
- Post-marketing safety evaluation and objective benefit-risk assessment of sublingual immunotherapy tablets in allergic rhinitis.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- Systemic Inflammation and Survival in Stage IV Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Discrete Choice Experiment (DCE) as a Tool to Elicit Patient Preferences in a Complex Benefit-Risk Evaluation: A Case Study.Clinical drug investigation · 2026Article
- Methodological comparisons for benefit-risk assessment in complex decision-making: applications and insights from a case study.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2026Article
- Impact of Additional Monitoring on Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacists' Role: A Scoping Review.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2025Article
- Key attributes of health and environmental risk decision-making: A scoping review.Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis · 2025Article
- Pharmacovigilance processes in low- and middle-income countries: moving from data collection to data analysis and interpretation.Therapeutic advances in drug safety · 2025Article
- Article
- Competing Benefits and Competing Hazards: The Benefit to Harm Balance in Individual Patients in Rational Therapeutics.Drug safety · 2024Article
- A proposal for using benefit-risk methods to improve the prominence of adverse event results when reporting trials.Trials · 2024Article
- Exploring different objectives in non-inferiority trials.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2024Article
- Methodological guidelines and publications of benefit-risk assessment for health technology assessment: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Drug Repurposing Using FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.Current drug targets · 2024Review
- Integrating environmental effects in the benefit-risk assessment of therapeutic products: a proposal and example for sustainable health and healthcare.Frontiers in drug safety and regulation · 2024Review
- A Structured Benefit-Risk Assessment Operating Model for Investigational Medicinal Products in the Pharmaceutical Industry.Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science · 2023Review
- Method for Calculating the Simultaneous Maximum Acceptable Risk Threshold (SMART) from Discrete-Choice Experiment Benefit-Risk Studies.Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making · 2023Article
- Quantitative Benefit-Risk Assessment of COVID-19 Vaccines Using the Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis.Vaccines · 2022Article
- Global Landscape of Benefit-Risk Considerations for Medicinal Products: Current State and Future Directions.Pharmaceutical medicine · 2022Article
- Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis for Benefit-Risk Analysis by National Regulatory Authorities.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A favorable benefit-risk profile remains an essential requirement for marketing authorization of medicinal drugs and devices. Furthermore, prior subjective, implicit and inconsistent ad hoc benefit-risk assessment methods have rightly evolved towards more systematic, explicit or "structured" approaches. Contemporary structured benefit-risk evaluation aims at providing an objective assessment of the benefit-risk profile of medicinal products and a higher transparency for decision making purposes. The use of a descriptive framework should be the preferred starting point for a structured benefit-risk assessment. In support of more precise assessments, quantitative and semi-quantitative methodologies have been developed and utilized to complement descriptive or qualitative frameworks in order to facilitate the structured evaluation of the benefit-risk profile of medicinal products. In addition, quantitative structured benefit-risk analysis allows integration of patient preference data. Collecting patient perspectives throughout the medical product development process has become increasingly important and key to the regulatory decision-making process. Both industry and regulatory authorities increasingly rely on descriptive structured benefit-risk evaluation and frameworks in drug, vaccine and device evaluation and comparison. Although varied qualitative methods are more commonplace, quantitative approaches have recently been emphasized. However, it is unclear how frequently these quantitative frameworks have been used by pharmaceutical companies to support submission dossiers for drug approvals or to respond to the health authorities' requests. The objective of this study has been to identify and review, for the first time, currently available, published, structured, quantitative benefit-risk evaluations which may have informed health care professionals and/or payor as well as contributed to decision making purposes in the regulatory setting for drug, vaccine and/or device approval. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY:
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.