Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343775›Full record

ArticlePharmacy practice

Ensuring intervention success: Assessing fit as an overlooked step of the implementation process.

Carrie M Blanchard, Melanie Livet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacy practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Carrie M BlanchardPharmD, MPH. Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Center for Medication Optimization, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC (United States). carriebm@email.unc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1236-4245
Melanie LivetPharmD, MPH. Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, Center for Medication Optimization, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina. Chapel Hill, NC (United States). melanie.livet@unc.edu.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7218-3163

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ensuring fit between a service and the implementing context is a critical but often overlooked precursor of implementation success. This commentary proposes five key considerations that should be evaluated when exploring fit: alignment with needs and metrics; alignment with organizational resources and capabilities; alignment with organizational priorities and culture; alignment with reimbursement mechanisms for long-term sustainability; and alignment with the regulatory environment. Successful uptake and implementation hinges on careful planning and, most importantly, appropriate fit between the service and the implementing environment.

Indexed as

Health ResourcesImplementation ScienceOrganizational CultureOrganizational InnovationPharmaceutical ServicesPharmacistsPlanning TechniquesReimbursement MechanismsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID33343775
PMCPMC7739514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.