ArticleEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority2020
Safety of 31 flavouring compounds belonging to different chemical groups when used as feed additives for all animal species.
Article in EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the flowering aerial parts ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2026Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the aerial parts ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil obtained from the flowering aerial parts ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the flowering aerial parts ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of feed additives consisting of rosemary tinctures obtained from the leaves ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2025Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the flowering stems ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil derived from the flowering tops ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
- Safety and efficacy of a feed additive consisting of an essential oil obtained from the fruit ofEFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2023Article
- Safety of feed additives consisting of β-damascone [07.083] and (E)-β-damascone [07.224] belonging to chemical group 8 for use in all animal species (FEFANA asbl).EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2022Article
- Safety of 31 flavouring compounds belonging to different chemical groups when used as feed additives for all animal species.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Following a request from the European Commission, the EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) was asked to deliver a scientific opinion on the safety of 31 compounds belonging to different chemical groups, when used as sensory additives in feed for all animal species. Twenty-two out of the 31 compounds were tested in tolerance studies in chickens for fattening, piglets and cattle for fattening. For the remaining nine compounds, read across from structurally similar compounds was proposed. No adverse effects were observed in the tolerance studies at 10-fold the intended level. The FEEDAP Panel concluded that the 22 compounds are safe for these species at the proposed use level and conclusions were extrapolated to all animal species for all the compounds except for α-damascone [07.134]. In the absence of data that would allow the FEEDAP Panel to rule out the genotoxicity concern, the FEEDAP Panel cannot extend the conclusions for α-damascone [07.134] to all animal species and cannot conclude on the safety for the consumer, the user and the environment. No safety concern would arise for the consumer from the use of the remaining 30 compounds up to the highest levels considered safe for target animals. The revised maximum safe levels for the 30 compounds are not expected to further impact on the previous conclusions on user safety. The concentrations considered safe for the target species are unlikely to have detrimental effects on the environment for all the compounds except β-damascone [07.083] and (E)-β-damascone [07.224], for which in the absence of ecotoxicity data, the FEEDAP Panel cannot conclude on the safety for the terrestrial compartments. For the marine environment, the safe use level for 2-methyl-1-phenylpropan-2-ol [02.035], α-irone [07.011], β-damascone [07.083] and (E)-β-damascone [07.224], phenethyl isovalerate [09.466], 4-(p-hydroxyphenyl) butan-2-one [07.055] and 2-isopropyl-4-methylthiazole [15.026] is confirmed to be 0.05 mg/kg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.