ReviewFuture virology2020
Brain tissue-resident immune memory cells are required for long-term protection against CNS infection with rabies virus.
Review in Future virology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Assessment of Immune Responses to Rabies Vaccination in Free-Ranging Dogs in Bengaluru, India.Vaccines · 2023Article
- Transcriptomic Profiling Identifies CD8Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2022Article
- Microbial neuraminidase induces TLR4-dependent long-term immune priming in the brain.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022Article
- CNS and CNS diseases in relation to their immune system.Frontiers in immunology · 2022Review
- Review
- Neuroimmune multi-hit perspective of coronaviral infection.Journal of neuroinflammation · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Immune memory cells residing in previously infected, nonlymphoid tissues play a role in immune surveillance. In the event that circulating antibodies fail to prevent virus spread to the tissues in a secondary infection, these memory cells provide an essential defense against tissue reinfection. CNS tissues are isolated from circulating immune cells and antibodies by the blood-brain barrier, making the presence of tissue-resident immune memory cells particularly needed to combat recurrent infection by neurotropic viruses. Wild-type and laboratory-engineered rabies viruses are neurotropic, differ in pathogenicity, and have varying effects on BBB functions. These viruses have proven invaluable tools in demonstrating the importance of tissue-resident immune memory cells in the reinfection of CNS tissues. Only Type 1 immune memory is effective at therapeutically clearing a secondary infection with wild-type rabies viruses from the CNS and does so despite the maintenance of blood-brain barrier integrity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.