Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2020

Physiological Profiling of Embryos and Dormant Seeds in Two

Catalina Moreno Curtidor, Maria Grazia Annunziata, Saurabh Gupta, Federico Apelt, Sarah Isabel Richard, Friedrich Kragler, Bernd Mueller-Roeber, Justyna Jadwiga Olas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. ComparativeFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Exploring the potential ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Catalina Moreno CurtidorDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Maria Grazia AnnunziataMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Saurabh GuptaMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Federico ApeltMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Sarah Isabel RichardDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Friedrich KraglerMax Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology, Potsdam, Germany.
Bernd Mueller-RoeberDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Justyna Jadwiga OlasDepartment of Molecular Biology, Institute of Biochemistry and Biology, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
Max Planck Institute of Molecular Plant Physiology · DEUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In flowering plants, sugars act as carbon sources providing energy for developing embryos and seeds. Although most studies focus on carbon metabolism in whole seeds, knowledge about how particular sugars contribute to the developmental transitions during embryogenesis is scarce. To develop a quantitative understanding of how carbon composition changes during embryo development, and to determine how sugar status contributes to final seed or embryo size, we performed metabolic profiling of hand-dissected embryos at late torpedo and mature stages, and dormant seeds, in two

Indexed as

carbonembryo developmenthexosesmetabolitessucrosesucrose synthase

Identifiers

PMID33343596
PMCPMC7738343
OpenAlexW3106670215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.