Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343536›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

A Comparative Evaluation of Tools to Predict Metabolite Profiles From Microbiome Sequencing Data.

Xiaochen Yin, Tomer Altman, Erica Rutherford, Kiana A West, Yonggan Wu, Jinlyung Choi, Paul L Beck, Gilaad G Kaplan, Karim Dabbagh, Todd Z DeSantis and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Mass spectrometry-based analysis of gut microbial metabolites of aromatic amino acids.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2023
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Towards a Deeper Understanding ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Xiaochen YinSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.
Tomer AltmanAltman Analytics LLC, San Francisco, CA, United States.
Erica RutherfordSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.
Kiana A WestSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.
Yonggan WuSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.
Jinlyung ChoiSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.
Paul L BeckDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Gilaad G KaplanDepartment of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Karim DabbaghSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.
Todd Z DeSantisSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.
Shoko IwaiSecond Genome Inc., Brisbane, CA, United States.

Funding

Development of a Commercial Platform for Discovery and Validation of Key Microbial Metabolites in CNS DisordersR44DA043954 · NIDA · SECOND GENOME, INC. · PI DESANTIS, TODD Z · 2017 to 2020
$2.1M
NIDA NIH HHS R44 DA043954
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metabolomic analyses of human gut microbiome samples can unveil the metabolic potential of host tissues and the numerous microorganisms they support, concurrently. As such, metabolomic information bears immense potential to improve disease diagnosis and therapeutic drug discovery. Unfortunately, as cohort sizes increase, comprehensive metabolomic profiling becomes costly and logistically difficult to perform at a large scale. To address these difficulties, we tested the feasibility of predicting the metabolites of a microbial community based solely on microbiome sequencing data. Paired microbiome sequencing (16S rRNA gene amplicons, shotgun metagenomics, and metatranscriptomics) and metabolome (mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy) datasets were collected from six independent studies spanning multiple diseases. We used these datasets to evaluate two reference-based gene-to-metabolite prediction pipelines and a machine-learning (ML) based metabolic profile prediction approach. With the pre-trained model on over 900 microbiome-metabolome paired samples, the ML approach yielded the most accurate predictions (i.e., highest F1 scores) of metabolite occurrences in the human gut and outperformed reference-based pipelines in predicting differential metabolites between case and control subjects. Our findings demonstrate the possibility of predicting metabolites from microbiome sequencing data, while highlighting certain limitations in detecting differential metabolites, and provide a framework to evaluate metabolite prediction pipelines, which will ultimately facilitate future investigations on microbial metabolites and human health.

Indexed as

computational predictionhuman microbiomemetabolic potentialmetabolomeNext Generation Sequence

Identifiers

PMID33343536
PMCPMC7746778

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.