Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343519›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2020

Infection of

Hua Wu, Zhong-Chen Rao, Li Cao, Patrick De Clercq, Ri-Chou Han

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Virulence · 2026
    Article
  2. Discovery of functional compounds from dimorphic edibleSynthetic and systems biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Conservation Crisis ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  5. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neurotransmitter acetylcholine mediates the mummification ofApplied and environmental microbiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  12. Mannitol mediates the mummification behavior ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  13. Knockdown ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  14. Unraveling the Secrets of a Double-Life Fungus by Genomics:Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Plant quercetin degradation by gut bacteriumFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hua WuDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Zhong-Chen RaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Li CaoGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
Patrick De ClercqDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Ri-Chou HanGuangdong Key Laboratory of Animal Conservation and Resource Utilization, Guangdong Public Laboratory of Wild Animal Conservation and Utilization, Institute of Zoology, Guangdong Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Chinese cordyceps is a unique and valuable parasitic complex of

Indexed as

Chinese cordycepsguthemolymphmicrobiotaOphiocordyceps sinensis fungusThitarodes/Hepialus moth

Identifiers

PMID33343519
PMCPMC7744566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.