Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343369›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2020

Evaluation of the Anticancer Activity of a Bile Acid-Dihydroartemisinin Hybrid Ursodeoxycholic-Dihydroartemisinin in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.

Tzu-En Huang, Yi-Ning Deng, Jui-Ling Hsu, Wohn-Jenn Leu, Elena Marchesi, Massimo L Capobianco, Paolo Marchetti, Maria Luisa Navacchia, Jih-Hwa Guh, Daniela Perrone and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Improving the antioxidant and anticancer potential ofBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Physiology and Physical Chemistry of Bile Acids.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tzu-En HuangSchool of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Yi-Ning DengSchool of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Jui-Ling HsuSchool of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Wohn-Jenn LeuSchool of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Elena MarchesiDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Massimo L CapobiancoInstitute of Organic Synthesis and Photoreactivity, National Research Council, Bologna, Italy.
Paolo MarchettiDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Maria Luisa NavacchiaInstitute of Organic Synthesis and Photoreactivity, National Research Council, Bologna, Italy.
Jih-Hwa GuhSchool of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Daniela PerroneDepartment of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy.
Lih-Ching HsuSchool of Pharmacy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TWUniversity of Ferrara · ITInstitute of Organic Synthesis and Photoreactivity · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy in adults and accounts for 85-90% of all primary liver cancer. Based on the estimation by the International Agency for Research on Cancer in 2018, liver cancer is the fourth leading cause of cancer death globally. Dihydroartemisinin (DHA), the main active metabolite of artemisinin derivatives, is a well-known drug for the treatment of malaria. Previous studies have demonstrated that DHA exhibits antitumor effects toward a variety of human cancers and has a potential for repurposing as an anticancer drug. However, its short half-life is a concern and may limit the application in cancer therapy. We have reported that UDC-DHA, a hybrid of bile acid ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and DHA, is ∼12 times more potent than DHA against a HCC cell line HepG2. In this study, we found that UDC-DHA was also effective against another HCC cell line Huh-7 with an IC

Indexed as

apoptosisbile acid-dihydroartemisinin hybridG0/G1 arresthepatocellular carcinomamitochondrial membrane potential lossreactive oxygen species

Identifiers

PMID33343369
PMCPMC7748086
OpenAlexW3103169457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.