ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2020
Picking Your Brains: Where and How Neuroscience Tools Can Enhance Marketing Research.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Neurophysiological approaches to exploring emotional responses to cosmetics: a systematic review of the literature.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2024Pooled it
- Discovery of a product's unconscious culture code and testing with fMRI.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Examining the Effect of Virtual Reality-Based Fast-Food Marketing on Eating-Related Outcomes in Young Adults: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
- Static vs. Immersive: A Neuromarketing Exploratory Study of Augmented Reality on Packaging Labels.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Comparison of Post-Consumption Attention Between Two Different Aroma Types of Baijiu Using the Stroop Task.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Effects of Competition on Left Prefrontal and Temporal Cortex During Conceptual Comparison of Brand-Name Product Pictures: Analysis of fNIRS Using Tensor Decomposition.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Virtual Reality-Based Food and Beverage Marketing: Potential Implications for Young People of Color, Knowledge Gaps, and Future Research Directions.JMIR public health and surveillance · 2024Article
- Radio, Podcasts, and Music Streaming-An Electroencephalography and Physiological Analysis of Listeners' Attitude, Attention, Memory, and Engagement.Brain sciences · 2024Article
- Temporal and electroencephalography dynamics of surreal marketing.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Application of Neuroscience Tools in Building Construction - An Interdisciplinary Analysis.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Review
- Feature selection of EEG signals in neuromarketing.PeerJ. Computer science · 2022Article
- Recognizing Personality Traits Using Consumer Behavior Patterns in a Virtual Retail Store.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Neurogastronomy as a Tool for Evaluating Emotions and Visual Preferences of Selected Food Served in Different Ways.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- A Sound Prediction: EEG-Based Neural Synchrony Predicts Online Music Streams.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Consumer Neuroscience: Attentional Preferences for Wine Labeling Reflected in the Posterior Contralateral Negativity.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
- Job Assessment Through Bioelectrical Measures: A Neuromanagement Perspective.Frontiers in psychology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The use of neuroscience tools to study consumer behavior and the decision making process in marketing has improved our understanding of cognitive, neuronal, and emotional mechanisms related to marketing-relevant behavior. However, knowledge about neuroscience tools that are used in consumer neuroscience research is scattered. In this article, we present the results of a literature review that aims to provide an overview of the available consumer neuroscience tools and classifies them according to their characteristics. We analyse a total of 219 full-texts in the area of consumer neuroscience. Our findings suggest that there are seven tools that are currently used in consumer neuroscience research. In particular, electroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking (ET) are the most commonly used tools in the field. We also find that consumer neuroscience tools are used to study consumer preferences and behaviors in different marketing domains such as advertising, branding, online experience, pricing, product development and product experience. Finally, we identify two ready-to-use platforms, namely iMotions and GRAIL that can help in integrating the measurements of different consumer neuroscience tools simultaneously. Measuring brain activity and physiological responses on a common platform could help by (1) reducing time and costs for experiments and (2) linking cognitive and emotional aspects with neuronal processes. Overall, this article provides relevant input in setting directions for future research and for business applications in consumer neuroscience. We hope that this study will provide help to researchers and practitioners in identifying available, non-invasive and useful tools to study consumer behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.