Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33343084›Full record

ArticleISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS)2020

Empirical validation of photon recollision probability in single crowns of tree seedlings.

Aarne Hovi, Petri Forsström, Giulia Ghielmetti, Michael E Schaepman, Miina Rautiainen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ISPRS journal of photogrammetry and remote sensing : official publication of the International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Aarne HoviAalto University, School of Engineering, Department of Built Environment, P.O. Box 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
Petri ForsströmAalto University, School of Engineering, Department of Built Environment, P.O. Box 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.
Giulia GhielmettiUniversity of Zürich, Department of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael E SchaepmanUniversity of Zürich, Department of Geography, Remote Sensing Laboratories, Winterthurerstrasse 190, CH-8057 Zurich, Switzerland.
Miina RautiainenAalto University, School of Engineering, Department of Built Environment, P.O. Box 14100, FI-00076 Aalto, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Physically-based methods in remote sensing provide benefits over statistical approaches in monitoring biophysical characteristics of vegetation. However, physically-based models still demand large computational resources and often require rather detailed informative priors on various aspects of vegetation and atmospheric status. Spectral invariants and photon recollision probability theories provide a solid theoretical framework for developing relatively simple models of forest canopy reflectance. Empirical validation of these theories is, however, scarce. Here we present results of a first empirical validation of a model based on photon recollision probability at the level of individual trees. Multiangular spectra of pine, spruce, and oak tree seedlings (height = 0.38-0.7 m) were measured using a goniometer, and tree hemispherical reflectance was derived from those measurements. We evaluated the agreement between modeled and measured tree reflectance. The model predicted the spectral signatures of the tree seedlings in the wavelength range between 400 and 2300 nm well, with wavelength-specific bias between -0.048 and 0.034 in reflectance units. In relative terms, the model errors were the smallest in the near-infrared (relative RMSE up to 4%, 7%, and 4% for pine, spruce, and oak seedlings, respectively) and the largest in the visible wavelength region (relative RMSE up to 34%, 20%, and 60%). The errors in the visible region could be partly attributed to wavelength-dependent directional scattering properties of the leaves. Including woody parts of tree seedlings in the model improved the results by reducing the relative RMSE by up to 10% depending on species and wavelength. Spectrally invariant model parameters, i.e. total and directional escape probabilities, depended on spherically averaged silhouette to total area ratio (STAR) of the tree seedlings. Overall, the modeled and measured tree reflectance mainly agreed within measurement uncertainties, but the results indicate that the assumption of isotropic scattering by the leaves can result in large errors in the visible wavelength region for some tree species. Our results help increasing the confidence when using photon recollision probability and spectral invariants -based models to interpret satellite images, but they also lead to an improved understanding of the assumptions and limitations of these theories.

Indexed as

Escape probabilityMultiangularp-theoryRadiative transfer modelingReflectance modelSpectral invariants

Identifiers

PMID33343084
PMCPMC7729829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.