Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33342667›Full record

ArticleJournal of substance abuse treatment2021

Re-thinking patient stability for methadone in opioid treatment programs during a global pandemic: Provider perspectives.

Mary A Hatch-Maillette, K Michelle Peavy, Judith I Tsui, Caleb J Banta-Green, Stephen Woolworth, Paul Grekin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of substance abuse treatment, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mary A Hatch-MailletteAlcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America; Department of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America. Electronic address: hatchm@uw.edu.
K Michelle PeavyEvergreen Treatment Services, 1700 Airport Way S., Seattle, WA 98134, United States of America.
Judith I TsuiEvergreen Treatment Services, 1700 Airport Way S., Seattle, WA 98134, United States of America; Division of Internal Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America.
Caleb J Banta-GreenAlcohol and Drug Abuse Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98105, United States of America; Department of Health Services, University of Washington School of Public Health, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America.
Stephen WoolworthEvergreen Treatment Services, 1700 Airport Way S., Seattle, WA 98134, United States of America.
Paul GrekinDepartment of Psychiatry & Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, United States of America; Evergreen Treatment Services, 1700 Airport Way S., Seattle, WA 98134, United States of America.
Perinatal Treatment Services · USUniversity of Washington · USSeattle Indian Health Board · US

Funding

University of Washington/Fred Hutch Center for AIDS ResearchP30AI027757 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EDWIN ROBERTO ORELLANA · 1988 to 2026
$104.9M
Clinical Trials Network: Pacific Northwest Node (CTN-0082, -0131, -0139 and dissemination library)UG1DA013714 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Mary Akiko Hatch, John M. Roll · 2015 to 2026
$19.8M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI027757NIDA NIH HHS UG1 DA013714
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 necessitated rapid changes in methadone take-home policies in opioid treatment programs (OTPs); these changes markedly contrast with existing, long-standing federal mandates on OTP rules about take-home methadone. OTP providers describe how these changes have affected clinical decision-making, equity in patient care, and workflow. We also discuss implications for medical ethics and patient autonomy. We provide suggestions for future research that will examine the impact of COVID-19 on OTP treatment and its patients, as well as the effect of making methadone take-home polices patient centered, all of which may foreshadow larger changes in the ways OTPs deliver their services.

Indexed as

COVID-19Clinical Decision-MakingHealth PersonnelHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersWorkflowMethadoneCOVID-19MethadoneOpioid treatment programsOTPsTake-home dosing

Identifiers

PMID33342667
PMCPMC8005420
OpenAlexW3112939818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.