Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33342617›Full record

ArticleClinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))2021

Recommendations for Multicentre Clinical Trials Involving Dosimetry for Molecular Radiotherapy.

J Taprogge, J Wadsley, E Miles, G D Flux

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain)), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. QuantitativeEJNMMI physics · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

J TaproggeNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) Group, Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT, Sutton, UK; The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK. Electronic address: jan.taprogge@icr.ac.uk.
J WadsleyWeston Park Hospital, Sheffield, UK.
E MilesNational Radiotherapy Trials Quality Assurance (RTTQA) Group, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, East and North Hertfordshire NHS Trust, Northwood, UK.
G D FluxThe Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK; Joint Department of Physics, Royal Marsden NHSFT, Sutton, UK.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 18349Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multicentre clinical trials involving a dosimetry component are becoming more prevalent in molecular radiotherapy and are essential to generate the evidence to support individualised approaches to treatment planning and to ensure that sufficient patients are recruited to achieve the statistical significance required. Quality assurance programmes should be considered to support the standardisation required to achieve meaningful results. Trials should be designed to ensure that dosimetry results from image acquisition systems across centres are comparable by incorporating steps to standardise the methodologies used for the quantification of images and dosimetry. Furthermore, it is essential to assess the expertise and resources available at each participating site prior to trial commencement. A quality assurance plan should be drawn up and training provided if necessary. Standardisation of quantification and dosimetry methodologies used in a trial are essential to ensure that results from different centres may be collated. In addition, appropriate uncertainty analysis should be carried out to correct for differences in methodologies between centres. Recommendations are provided to support dosimetry studies based on the experience of several previous and ongoing multicentre trials.

Indexed as

RadiometryHumansQuality Assurance, Health CareRadiation OncologyRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedDosimetrymolecular radiotherapymulticentre trialquality assurance

Identifiers

PMID33342617
PMCPMC7818526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.