Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33342242›Full record

ArticleHypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979)2021

Cost-Effectiveness of Initiating Pharmacological Treatment in Stage One Hypertension Based on 10-Year Cardiovascular Disease Risk: A Markov Modeling Study.

Margaret Constanti, Christopher N Floyd, Mark Glover, Rebecca Boffa, Anthony S Wierzbicki, Richard J McManus

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Cost-effectiveness analysis of early antihypertensive treatment for hypertension detected at health screening.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Margaret ConstantiFrom the National Guideline Centre (NGC), Regent's Park, London (M.C., R.B.).
Christopher N FloydDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital Campus (C.N.F.).
Mark GloverMRC Clinician Scientist, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham (M.G.).
Rebecca BoffaFrom the National Guideline Centre (NGC), Regent's Park, London (M.C., R.B.).
Anthony S WierzbickiDepartment of Metabolic Medicine/Chemical Pathology, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals, London (A.S.W.).
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford (R.J.M.).
St Thomas' Hospital · GBGuideline Geo (Sweden) · SENuffield Health · GBQueen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

Department of Health NIHR-RP-02-12-015Medical Research Council G1000861Medical Research Council MR/L006162/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antihypertensive drug treatment is cost-effective for adults at high risk of developing cardiovascular disease (CVD). However, the cost-effectiveness in people with stage 1 hypertension (140-159 mm Hg systolic blood pressure) at lower CVD risk remains unclear. The objective was to establish the 10-year CVD risk threshold where initiating antihypertensive drug treatment for primary prevention in adults, with stage 1 hypertension, becomes cost-effective. A lifetime horizon Markov model compared antihypertensive drug versus no treatment, using a UK National Health Service perspective. Analyses were conducted for groups ranging between 5% and 20% 10-year CVD risk. Health states included no CVD event, CVD and non-CVD death, and 6 nonfatal CVD morbidities. Interventions were compared using cost-per-quality-adjusted life-years. The base-case age was 60, with analyses repeated between ages 40 and 75. The model was run separately for men and women, and threshold CVD risk assessed against the minimum plausible risk for each group. Treatment was cost-effective at 10% CVD risk for both sexes (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio £10 017/quality-adjusted life-year [$14 542] men, £8635/QALY [$12 536] women) in the base-case. The result was robust in probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses but was sensitive to treatment effects. Treatment was cost-effective for men regardless of age and women aged >60. Initiating treatment in stage 1 hypertension for people aged 60 is cost-effective regardless of 10-year CVD risk. For other age groups, it is also cost-effective to treat regardless of risk, except in younger women.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAdultAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureCardiovascular DiseasesCost-Benefit AnalysisFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedQuality-Adjusted Life YearsAntihypertensive Agentsblood pressurecardiovascular diseaseseconomic modelprimary preventionquality-adjusted life-year

Identifiers

PMID33342242
PMCPMC7803450
OpenAlexW3114367931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.