Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33341980›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2021

Social support, social cohesion and pain during pregnancy: The Japan Environment and Children's Study.

Keiko Yamada, Takashi Kimura, Meishan Cui, Yasuhiko Kubota, Satoyo Ikehara, Hiroyasu Iso, Japan Environment and Children's Study Group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pain (London, England), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Keiko YamadaPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-4378-3290
Takashi KimuraDepartment of Public Health, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6839-8962
Meishan CuiPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-7521-1900
Yasuhiko KubotaOsaka Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3270-2176
Satoyo IkeharaPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-8796-2696
Hiroyasu IsoPublic Health, Department of Social Medicine, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9241-7289
Japan Environment and Children's Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersistent pain during pregnancy is a significant health issue, which could be correlated with psychological distress resulting from inadequate social support. This study aims to investigate whether the relationship between poor social support and antenatal pain is mediated by psychological distress. We also aimed to examine whether social cohesion moderates the influence of psychological distress on the relationship between social support and antenatal pain.

methodsWe analysed 94,517 pregnancies of women from a Japanese national birth cohort completed questionnaires assessing pain, psychological distress, social support and social cohesion. Psychological distress was assessed using the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale. Two types of models were used: the mediation model to examine whether the association between social support and pain was mediated by psychological distress; the moderated mediation model to analyse whether social cohesion buffered the negative effect of inadequate social support on pain. Demographic, socioeconomic and psychological factors were controlled for in all analyses.

resultsPsychological distress was fully mediated the association between social support and pain. Social cohesion had a focal moderation effect on the inverse association between social support and psychological distress (unstandardized regression coefficient [β] = 0.09; 95% CI, 0.07-0.11) and functioned as moderator for the indirect effect of social support on antenatal pain (index of moderated mediation = 0.006; 95% CI, 0.004-0.007).

conclusionsPoor social support was related to antenatal pain through psychological distress, possibly buffered by social cohesion. During the antenatal period, social support and cohesion are important for women. SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, poor social support was found to be associated with pain intensity during pregnancy, which was mediated by psychological distress and might be buffered by desirable social cohesion. This finding could potentially help healthcare providers and policy makers to understand the importance of desirable social cohesion in preventing pain among pregnant women.

Indexed as

Cooperative BehaviorPsychological DistressChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanPainPregnancySocial SupportStress, Psychological

Identifiers

PMID33341980
PMCPMC8048612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.