Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33341480›Full record

ArticleJournal of infection and public health2021

Medical students' acceptance and perceptions of e-learning during the Covid-19 closure time in King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah.

Nahla Khamis Ibrahim, Rajaa Al Raddadi, Moroj AlDarmasi, Abdullah Al Ghamdi, Mahmoud Gaddoury, Hussain M AlBar, Iman Kamal Ramadan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of infection and public health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. E-learning in health professions education during the COVID-19 pandemic: a systematic review.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Digital Eye Strain among Peruvian Nursing Students: Prevalence and Associated Factors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nahla Khamis IbrahimCommunity Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia; Epidemiology Department, High Institute of Public Health, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt. Electronic address: nahlakhamis@yahoo.com.
Rajaa Al RaddadiCommunity Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Moroj AlDarmasiCommunity Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Abdullah Al GhamdiCommunity Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Mahmoud GaddouryCommunity Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hussain M AlBarCommunity Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Iman Kamal RamadanCommunity Medicine Department, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNowadays, there is a paradigm shift in medical education. This shift occurred following the Covid-19 crisis. The world uses digital e-learning to support the public health response to this pandemic. The study's objective was to determine the medical students' acceptance and perceptions of e-learning during the Covid-19 closure time in Jeddah.

methodsA cross-sectional, web-based study was done among 340 medical students from King Abdulaziz University, 2020. A standardized, electronic, self-administered, Google Form data collection sheet was distributed. It included the E-learning acceptance measure (ElAM) containing three constructs, namely: tutor quality (TQ), perceived usefulness (PU), and facilitating conditions (FC). The sheet also inquired about the students' perceptions of the benefits, enablers, and barriers to e-learning. Descriptive, inferential statistics and multiple linear regression analyses were applied.

resultsBlackboard and Zoom were the most preferred Learning Management Systems (LMS) by our medical students. The mean score of ElAM was 102.82 ± 24.102. Better achievers obtained significantly (P < 0.001) higher scores in all ElAM constructs. About three-fifths of the students confirmed that e-learning substituted classical on-campus learning and was an adaptable, and less time-consuming method. The educator's good e-learning skills, the subject, instructional design, interaction, motivation, and good LMS were agreed as enablers of e-learning. However, most students accepted that clinical teaching is the most challenging learning outcome and that exams could be affected by low internet quality.

conclusionMedical students moderately accepted e-learning during the Covid-19 Pandemic closure time. More training of the students and tutors, better designing e-courses, more interaction, motivation, and blended learning are recommended.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalCOVID-19SARS-CoV-2Computer-Assisted InstructionCross-Sectional StudiesEducation, Medical, UndergraduateEgyptFemaleHumansInternetMaleStudents, MedicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAcceptanceBarriersCovid-19Digital e-learningElAMEnablersPandemicPerception

Identifiers

PMID33341480
PMCPMC7836241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.