Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33341101›Full record

ArticleActa paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992)2021

How Swedish guidelines on urinary tract infections in children compare to Canadian, American and European guidelines.

Per Brandström, Magnus Lindén

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Primary vesicoureteral reflux.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2024
    Review
  8. Genetic determinants of renal scarring in children with febrile UTI.Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Per BrandströmDept of Paediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-8269-4488
Magnus LindénDept of Paediatrics, Hospital of Halland, Halmstad, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in children and the guidelines focus on preventing kidney damage. We compared the 2013 national Swedish guidelines on UTIs in children with the guidelines from America, Canada, UK, Spain, Italy and European urologists. This showed that urinalysis and urine cultures are endorsed by all the guidelines, but sampling techniques and bacteria levels differ. They all recommend initial oral treatment and renal ultrasound to detect major anomalies in infants. The Swedish guidelines are more liberal on antibiotic prophylaxis.

conclusionDifferences in diagnostic criteria, workup and accepted methods for urine sampling were noted and are discussed.

Indexed as

Urinary Tract InfectionsVesico-Ureteral RefluxAntibiotic ProphylaxisCanadaChildHumansInfantItalySpainSwedenUnited Statesantibiotic prophylaxisdiagnostic criteriaguidelinesurinary tract infectionvesicoureteral reflux

Identifiers

PMID33341101
PMCPMC8247322

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.