Evidence map›Paper›PMID 33340874›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of emergency medicine2021

COVID-19 infection among emergency department healthcare providers in a large tertiary academic medical center following the peak of the pandemic.

Eric Murakami, Aditi Ghatak-Roy, Margarita Popova, Carin Gannon, Daniel E Park, Jack Villani, Cindy Liu, Ian Toma, John Lafleur

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of emergency medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Eric MurakamiDepartment Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Aditi Ghatak-RoyDepartment Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Margarita PopovaDepartment Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Carin GannonDepartment Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Daniel E ParkDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Jack VillaniDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Cindy LiuDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, George Washington University School of Public Health, Washington, DC, USA.
Ian TomaDepartment Genomic Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
John LafleurDepartment Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine, Washington, DC, USA. Electronic address: jlafleur@mfa.gwu.edu.
George Washington University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has spread through the US during the last few months exposing healthcare providers to possible infection. Here we report testing of emergency department (ED) healthcare providers (HCP) for exposure to COVID-19 through lateral flow point of care (POC) and lab-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), and RTq-PCR for evidence of acute infection. 138 ED HCP were tested between May 26th (approximately one month after the peak of COVID-19 first wave of cases) and June 14th. Enrolled ED HCP represented about 70% of the total ED HCP workforce during the study period. Subjects were tested with a POC COVID-19 antibody test, and standard ELISA performed by a university-based research lab. Subjects also provided a mid-turbinate swab and a saliva specimen for RTq-PCR. All subjects provided demographic information, past medical history, information about personal protective equipment (PPE) use, COVID-19 symptoms, as well as potential COVID-19 exposures during the previous 4 weeks, both in the ED, and outside the clinical setting. None of the HCP had positive RT-PCR results; 7 HCP (5%) had positive IgG for COVID-19; there was strong agreement between the lab-based ELISA (reference test) and the POC Ab test (P ≤ 0.0001). For the POC Ab test there were no false negatives and only one false positive among the 138 participants. There was no significant difference in demographic/ethnic variables, past medical history, hours worked in the ED, PPE use, or concerning exposures between seropositive and seronegative individuals. Moreover, there was no significant difference in reported symptoms between the two groups during the previous four weeks. The rate of COVID-19 seroconversion in our ED was 5% during the month following the pandemic's first wave. Based on questionnaire responses, differences in demographics/ethnicity, medical history, COVID-19 exposures, and PPE use were not associated with ED HCP having been infected with SARS-CoV-2. In the setting of our limited cohort of subjects the COVID-19 POC Ab test performed comparably to the ELISA lab-based standard.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAcademic Medical CentersAdultCohort StudiesCOVID-19FemaleHealth PersonnelHumansMaleOccupational DiseasesOccupational ExposureUnited StatesCovid-19Emergency medicineEpidemiologyHealth care providerPersonal protective equipmentSARS-CoV-2Seropositive

Identifiers

PMID33340874
PMCPMC7708800
OpenAlexW3106965166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.